Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 22:48 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.0m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 9.5 MB (6.5 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 5

67 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 13.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 13.0s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€531 investment → €8,495/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€531
6.3 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
€8.495
€101.937/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+19088% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5310.1 mo payback · +19088% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€21 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 13.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 10.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 202ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€531 6.3 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€21 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.724 / month at risk ~€80.684 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.722 /mo

+30.6pp bounce · ~3,056 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€1,51 /mo

20443.5 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.0 MB per page load
    Saves €1,51/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

48
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.89 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

12.96 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

202 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.314

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.93 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

14.36 s

Desktop

87
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.06 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.84 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

8 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.079

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.65 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.12 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

TYPO3 CMS · 28 peers
You 73
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Better than 21% of TYPO3 CMS sites See full TYPO3 CMS benchmark →
Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 73
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Sustainability P15SEO P73Performance P29Accessibility P57Security P54Content P48Infrastructure P50Compliance P50

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 90+ on Sustainability; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 39% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

TYPO3 CMS, on Apache/JSS, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

17 technologies detected 6 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
CMS
TYPO3 CMS
Framework
Bootstrap Bulma Consent Manager Glide.js Google Search Console Microsoft 365 Onsen UI Open Graph Tailwind CSS Underscore.js 4.17.21 VideoJS
Runtime
JSS PHP
Server
Apache
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server

All Detected Technologies (17)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

JSS is an authoring tool for CSS which allows you to use JavaScript to describe styles in a declarative, conflict-free and reusable way.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Development Website https://cssinjs.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

TYPO3 is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP.

Categories CMS Website https://typo3.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 3 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
Categories Framework Website https://bulma.io Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 8 Bulma class patterns in HTML

Consent Manager is a provider ensuring GDPR and CCPA compliance for websites.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.consentmanager.net Detected by BeaverCheck

Glide.js is a dependency-free JavaScript ES6 slider and carousel.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://glidejs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: Google-site-verification=iH1wwK8MsW2ucUAIcKBvqp7AGuQwKf8W2Jgw4-KHQ0k
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: continental-com.mail.protection.outlook.com

Onsen UI is an open-source HTML5 hybrid app framework offering mobile UI components for PhoneGap and Cordova development.

Categories Mobile frameworks Website https://onsen.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 11 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Video.js is a JavaScript and CSS library that makes it easier to work with and build on HTML5 video.

Categories Video players Website https://videojs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WN9297K

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontinental.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/38f9b1cf-2408-41c0-bb92-f7e96a032d28)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/38f9b1cf-2408-41c0-bb92-f7e96a032d28"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontinental.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontinental.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → C (79)
  • · Page weighs 9.5 MB (6.5 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 67 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (83)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback