Skip to content
https://news.ycombinator.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
100
TTFB degrading ↓
672ms
FCP stable →
808ms
LCP stable →
808ms
Scanned
2026-05-09 07:34 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
1.0m
Vs prev
Improved by +2

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 524ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (99ms), slowest from Singapore (799ms). No CDN detected. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Netherlands - Amsterdam
Full audit
604ms
DNS 2ms · TLS 303ms
United States - Santa Clara
99ms
DNS 30ms · TLS 35ms
United Stated - New York
268ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 133ms
Spain - Madrid
663ms
DNS 28ms · TLS 319ms
Singapore - Singapore
799ms
DNS 99ms · TLS 351ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
713ms
DNS 41ms · TLS 337ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 524ms · Cache: private; max-age=0

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 3

1 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

3 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

30 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
4 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$950 investment → $2,282/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$950
9.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$2,282
$27,385/yr
Payback
0.4 mo
+2783% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$7500.3 mo payback · +3551% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~20%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+20pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
3
  • 118 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$950 9.5 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$100 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$15,407 / month at risk ~$184,885 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No headings found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 3 image(s) missing alt attribute
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 1 image-in-link without alt text
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 1 control(s) without accessible label
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$2,282 /mo

+19.7pp bounce · ~1,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 1.16

Bandwidth Waste

$0.00 /mo

34.5 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3 KB per page load
    Saves $0.00/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
52
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
75
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

864 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

928 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

14 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.37 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

928 ms

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
52
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
75
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

234 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

251 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

556 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

251 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 78.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 539 peers
You 81
·
Avg 73
+8 above average
0 50 100
Performance P99SEO P2Content P3Security P97Compliance P6Sustainability P84Accessibility P82Infrastructure P80

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 82 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
HSTS · 2430 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Content P2Performance P94Security P91Compliance P10SEO P23Accessibility P74Sustainability P71Infrastructure P70

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 57 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, with Nginx CDN

4 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
HSTS RSS
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (4)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/39283171-4290-4b87-a269-931c781a0a0d)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/39283171-4290-4b87-a269-931c781a0a0d"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 10h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (84)
  • · 1 image-in-link without alt text
  • · 30 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 2h → B (86)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · 3 image(s) missing alt attribute

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+2

Higher effort, long-term payoff

1 findings 6h → B (88)
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback