Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Excellent global latency — average 28ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (10ms), slowest from Madrid (89ms). No CDN detected.
Audit overview
Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
21 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
21 image-in-link without alt text
Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.
32 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€1,233 investment → €1,607/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~21%.
- Severe layout shift during page loadUsers mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration→ Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
- Page loads in 2.7sEvery additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 211ms over→ Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 538ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 34 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance→ Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- 6 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerGDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- 6 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- 6 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerePrivacy Directive: EUR 5.000 – EUR 100.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€1.283 /mo
+21.3pp bounce · ~2,131 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 0.60
Bandwidth Waste
€0,13 /mo
1710.3 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~171 KB per page loadSaves €0,13/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.81 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.71 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
538 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.315
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.02 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
4.72 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
392 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
775 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
52 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.093
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
850 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.25 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
21 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of jQuery sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
HSTS, on PHP, hosted on Apache Traffic Server
Stack Architecture
MediaWiki 
Open Graph 
Redux 
jQuery 3.7.1
PHP 
Apache Traffic Server 9.2.13All Detected Technologies (7)
Apache Traffic Server is an open-source caching and proxying server that serves as an HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 reverse proxy with caching capabilities, load balancing, request routing, SSL termination, and support for advanced HTTP features.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
MediaWiki is a free and open-source wiki engine.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Redux is a predictable state container for JavaScript applications.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Observations (1)
No build tool detected
A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/39fb44db-ab36-4638-a9d3-e32af501ddef)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/39fb44db-ab36-4638-a9d3-e32af501ddef"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FOctopus" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FOctopusExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 14h total → projected A (91)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 21 image-in-link without alt text
- · 32 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 21 image(s) missing alt attribute
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+5Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source