Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
40
TTFB improving ↑
221ms
FCP stable →
4.8s
LCP stable →
12.8s
Scanned
2026-05-22 11:48 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
1.4m
Vs prev
Improved by +2

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 498ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (137ms), slowest from New York (736ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). 4 locations above the 500ms target.

United Stated - New York
Full audit
736ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 9ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
137ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 9ms
United States - Santa Clara
532ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 11ms
Spain - Madrid
260ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 25ms
Singapore - Singapore
642ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 9ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
682ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 498ms · Cache: s-maxage=60, stale-while-revalidate

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 18.3 MB (19.7 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

8 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 14.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 14.0s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$667 investment → $10,307/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$667
6.7 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$10,307
$123,681/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18452% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6500.1 mo payback · +18928% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$67 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.

Barriers
8
4 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+34pp
added vs baseline
Score
48
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 14.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 11.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.2s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Mixed content on HTTPS page
    Browsers block insecure subresources — broken images, missing scripts, warning badge
    → Change http:// URLs inside the page to https:// (or protocol-relative)
  • 5 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$667 6.7 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$67 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$9,267 / month at risk ~$111,199 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H4 (missing H3)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$9,262 /mo

+34.4pp bounce · ~3,443 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$4.96 /mo

61983.1 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~6.2 MB per page load
    Saves $4.96/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

31
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

11.05 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.96 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.18 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.054

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

11.05 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

19.74 s

Desktop

64
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.09 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.35 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

77 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.012

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.51 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.36 s

Categories

8
Avg score 82.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3805 peers
You 84
·
Avg 73
+11 above average
0 50 100
Security P98Accessibility P95Performance P75Compliance P74Infrastructure P69Content P38Sustainability P42SEO P45

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 2494 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Security P96Accessibility P91Compliance P73Performance P68Content P35Infrastructure P65Sustainability P36SEO P43

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, with Cloudflare CDN

11 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Microsoft 365 Nuxt UI Nuxt.js Open Graph Pinia Priority Hints Vue.js
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (11)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=6XZSR26fKsAwMaVRDBjzrrACuFhyvEewrya1KS-Dt7Q

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: norriq-com.mail.protection.outlook.com

Nuxt UI is a customizable UI library designed for Nuxt.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://ui.nuxt.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Nuxt is a Vue framework for developing modern web applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Static site generator Website https://nuxt.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Pinia is a state management library for Vue.js.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://pinia.vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnorriq.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/3a052cfd-9383-406b-a44a-7a02f516620f)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/3a052cfd-9383-406b-a44a-7a02f516620f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnorriq.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnorriq.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → A (90)
  • · Page weighs 18.3 MB (19.7 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 8 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (92)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback