Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-20 07:56 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
29.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 666ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (136ms), slowest from Singapore (1412ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
152ms
DNS 62ms · TLS 27ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
136ms
DNS 50ms · TLS 25ms
United Stated - New York
445ms
DNS 174ms · TLS 87ms
United States - Santa Clara
813ms
DNS 307ms · TLS 165ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1037ms
DNS 412ms · TLS 206ms
Singapore - Singapore
1412ms
DNS 351ms · TLS 247ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 666ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€693 investment → €3,377/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€693
8.7 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€3.377
€40.519/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+5744% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€6000.2 mo payback · +6653% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€13 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~15%.

Barriers
6
6 warn
Bounce delta
+15pp
added vs baseline
Score
82
B
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€693 8.7 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€13 1 fixes in ~10 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€3.377 / month at risk ~€40.519 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

RGPDEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3.377 /mo

+15.3pp bounce · ~1,535 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,01 /mo

101.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~10 KB per page load
    Saves €0,01/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

969 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

999 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

5 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.019

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.08 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.05 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

260 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

269 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.022

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

457 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

270 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 73.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Font Awesome · 581 peers
You 76
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
SEO P1Performance P99Infrastructure P7Content P16Compliance P22Accessibility P25Security P75Sustainability P54

Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 70% of Font Awesome sites See full Font Awesome benchmark →
HSTS · 2611 peers
You 76
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Performance P98Infrastructure P4SEO P6Content P10Accessibility P17Compliance P30Sustainability P46Security P50

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 79 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 55% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Font Awesome 5.15.3, with Cloudflare CDN

5 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Font Awesome 5.15.3HSTS jQuery 3.6.1
CDN
Cloudflare cdnjs

All Detected Technologies (5)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

cdnjs is a free distributed JS library delivery service.

Categories CDN Website https://cdnjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains cdnjs.cloudflare.com: https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/font-awesome/5.15.3/js/all.min.js

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.1/jquery.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Font Awesome) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FMYMOONOVA.COM)](https://beavercheck.com/results/3b672459-239f-49c1-ad86-7b11e4a2b82a)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/3b672459-239f-49c1-ad86-7b11e4a2b82a"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FMYMOONOVA.COM" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FMYMOONOVA.COM

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 9h total → projected B (84)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+1

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → C (77)
  • · No <main> landmark found

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+7

Medium effort, high structural impact

4 findings 8h → B (84)
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback