Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-16 18:01 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
2.3m
Vs prev

Audit overview

6 categories need attention: Security, and 5 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 4.9 MB (4.9 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 27.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 27.8s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

¥2,683 investment → ¥30,347/month returns + CNY 50,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
¥2,683
7.7 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
¥30,347
¥364,161/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+13471% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CNY 50,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
¥2,6250.1 mo payback · +13773% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
¥58 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 27.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 25.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 736ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

¥2,683 7.7 developer hours at ¥350/hr
Quick wins
¥58 1 fixes in ~10 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

¥ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

¥30,347 / month at risk ~¥364,161 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

¥50,000,000

PIPL
  • No privacy policy link detected
    PIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    PIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

¥30,338 /mo

+30.3pp bounce · ~3,034 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CNY 10.00

Bandwidth Waste

¥8.78 /mo

15359.7 MB/mo × 0.571 CNY/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page load
    Saves ¥8.78/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

37
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
78
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
58
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

26.91 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

27.78 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

736 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

42.85 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

28.00 s

Desktop

56
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
78
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
58
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.32 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.35 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

15.72 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.35 s

Categories

8
Avg score 64.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

core-js · 1605 peers
You 67
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
SEO P1Infrastructure P1Compliance P1Sustainability P5Content P11Accessibility P18Security P75Performance P74

Top 10% of core-js sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 64 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 1% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →
HSTS · 2611 peers
You 67
·
Avg 75
-8 below average
0 50 100
SEO P1Infrastructure P1Compliance P2Sustainability P2Content P10Accessibility P12Performance P49Security P50

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 64 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Technology stack

HSTS, with Nginx CDN

7 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
HSTS Prism Ubuntu Underscore.js 4.17.21 Webpack core-js 2.6.12
CDN
Nginx 1.18.0

All Detected Technologies (7)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Prism is an extensible syntax highlighter.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://prismjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Ubuntu is a free and open-source operating system on Linux for the enterprise server, desktop, cloud, and IoT.

Categories Operating systems Website https://www.ubuntu.com/server Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhihonorcloud.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/3c0b583f-68c6-4399-9ad5-3b1a57a4a71a)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/3c0b583f-68c6-4399-9ad5-3b1a57a4a71a"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhihonorcloud.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhihonorcloud.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected C (77)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (71)
  • · Page weighs 4.9 MB (4.9 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → C (77)
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback