Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 19:14 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.9m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'FTR_Cache_Status' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

2 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€660 investment → €6,220/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€660
8.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€6.220
€74.638/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11209% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5000.1 mo payback · +14828% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€60 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
5
3 crit 2 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
64
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
1
  • Page takes 15.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 13.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 910ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 8 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€660 8.3 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€60 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.220 / month at risk ~€74.638 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveRGPDEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • 3 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.219 /mo

+28.3pp bounce · ~2,827 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,44 /mo

5963.0 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~596 KB per page load
    Saves €0,44/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

44
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.05 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

15.89 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

910 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.65 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

17.65 s

Desktop

87
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.18 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.87 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

19 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.71 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.00 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Alpine.js · 150 peers
You 73
·
Avg 80
-7 below average
0 50 100
Better than 20% of Alpine.js sites See full Alpine.js benchmark →
Amazon Route 53 · 1003 peers
You 73
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Sustainability P85Compliance P24Content P26Security P32Infrastructure P66Performance P62Accessibility P58SEO P57

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 48% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →

Technology stack

Alpine.js 3.14.1, with Fastly CDN

20 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google AdSense Google Analytics Google Tag Manager ID5 1.0.97 Marfeel Prebid comScore
Framework
Alpine.js 3.14.1Amazon Route 53 Facebook Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Loadable-Components Open Graph Priority Hints RSS Sirdata Varnish
CDN
Fastly

All Detected Technologies (20)

Categories CDN Website https://www.fastly.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-served-by: cache-toj-leto2350037-TOJ

Alpine.js is a minimal framework for composing behavior directly in your markup.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://alpinejs.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-565.awsdns-06.net
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=6pinla03xa9pgd6pmbrtnkdi4tnd6s
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=r__7kbK16sjhsKqut69uwYP5Pr-vF3AtLxA14wKK67E
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Loadable-Components is a library to solve the React code-splitting client-side and server-side.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/gregberge/loadable-components Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Sirdata is a self-service, third party data-collecting platform that specialises in the collection of behavioural data, predictive targeting and selling of audience segments.

Categories Customer data platform, Cookie compliance, Segmentation Website https://www.sirdata.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google AdSense is a program run by Google through which website publishers serve advertisements that are targeted to the site content and audience.

Categories Advertising Website https://www.google.com/adsense/start/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WHLXGS3C&gtm=4e64h1

ID5 is a company that offers an identity solution for digital advertising, providing a Universal ID that enables privacy-compliant user recognition and tracking across websites without relying on personal information or third-party cookies.

Categories Advertising Website https://id5.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Marfeel is a publisher platform that allows publishers to create, optimise and monetise their mobile websites.

Categories Analytics, Advertising Website https://www.marfeel.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Prebid is an open-source header bidding wrapper. It forms the core of our Nucleus ad platform, helping maximize revenue and performance for publishers.

Categories Advertising Website https://prebid.org Detected by BeaverCheck

comScore is an American media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises; media and advertising agencies; and publishers.

Categories Analytics Website https://comscore.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Alpine.js) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

20 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechradar.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/3cb19501-f67e-4385-acbf-45fc6552bd20)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/3cb19501-f67e-4385-acbf-45fc6552bd20"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechradar.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechradar.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · Cookie 'FTR_Cache_Status' is missing the Secure flag
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (82)
  • · 2 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback