Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 1093ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (67ms), slowest from Singapore (2111ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 5 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
memorizza.com.br fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
/.htaccess is publicly accessible
Sensitive resource publicly accessible — restrict access or remove.
17 third-party resources (68% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
25 inline style attribute(s) detected
Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.
4 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3
Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
BRL 1,260 investment → BRL 42,606/month returns + BRL 50,000,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~23%.
- Page takes 4.5s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 2.0s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Content is hard to readGraduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages→ Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
- 2 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
BRL 50.000.000
- No privacy policy link detectedLGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000
- 3 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerLGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000
- 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedLGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
BRL 41.035 /mo
+22.9pp bounce · ~2,286 lost visitors/mo
CPC: BRL 17.95
Bandwidth Waste
BRL 1,14 /mo
2766.9 MB/mo × 0.410 BRL/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~277 KB per page loadSaves BRL 1,14/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.85 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
4.48 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
148 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.09 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
7.52 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.62 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.62 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.62 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.62 s
Categories
8Performance
17 third-party resources (68% of weight)
Security
/.htaccess is publicly accessible
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 57 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
AMP, with Nginx CDN
Stack Architecture
Google AdSense 
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
AMP 
Bootstrap 
Bootstrap Icons 1.11.3
Google Font API HSTS 
Open Graph 
Nginx 1.30.4
jsDelivr All Detected Technologies (11)
Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.
JSDelivr is a free public CDN for open-source projects. It can serve web files directly from the npm registry and GitHub repositories without any configuration.
AMP, originally created by Google, is an open-source HTML framework developed by the AMP open-source Project. AMP is designed to help webpages load faster.
Bootstrap Icons is a growing library of SVG icons that are designed by @mdo and maintained by the Bootstrap Team.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Google AdSense is a program run by Google through which website publishers serve advertisements that are targeted to the site content and audience.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (AMP) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/memorizza.com.br)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/memorizza.com.br"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.memorizza.com.br" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.memorizza.com.brExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (88)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+2Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 17 third-party resources (68% of weight)
- · 4 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · /.htaccess is publicly accessible
- · 2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
- · 25 inline style attribute(s) detected