C — https://abril.com.br | BeaverCheck Audit

Site Health

Score: 72 / 100

Based on 8 categories, 0 sections

Decent speed, but optimizing further could improve engagement.

Several missing protections leave your users and data exposed.

Several issues make your site difficult for assistive technology users.

Solid SEO basics — a few optimizations could boost rankings.

Solid infrastructure — fast server responses across the board.

Mostly compliant — a few items need attention.

Good content signals with minor gaps.

Heavier than average — reducing page weight saves energy and bandwidth.

How is this calculated?

The overall score is a weighted average of individual category scores. Categories with more impact on user experience and security carry more weight.

Performance 25%Security 25%Accessibility 15%SEO 10%Infrastructure 10%Compliance 8%Content 5%Sustainability 2%

Weights reflect general web best practices. Individual needs may differ.

How the composite score is calculated

How you compare

WordPress · 712 peers

You 72

Avg 74

At average

0 50 100

Better than 18% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →

Facebook · 1367 peers

You 72

Avg 72

At average

0 50 100

Better than 34% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →

Top Priorities (5)

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Security Headers

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Content Security Policy

77 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Security Headers

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Security Headers

View fix priority matrix

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Impact

Quick Wins

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Embed this badge

Markdown

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fabril.com.br)](https://beavercheck.com/results/3df3c1c3-c204-45a9-9cbc-2b00edb2c22f)

HTML

<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/3df3c1c3-c204-45a9-9cbc-2b00edb2c22f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fabril.com.br" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>

Image URL

https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fabril.com.br

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

What fixing these means

Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 6.4s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.

4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Your LCP is 6.4s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Conversion Barriers

2 critical 6 warning

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Speed (2)

Page takes 6.4s to load

+12% bounce

Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.9s over the 2.5s threshold

Fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images

Page feels frozen for 754ms

+5% bounce

Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs

Fix: Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration

Trust (2)

No HSTS header

+1% bounce

Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request

Fix: Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

No Content-Security-Policy header

+1% bounce

Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form

Fix: Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Content (2)

No Open Graph tags

+2% bounce

Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop

Fix: Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Thin content

+3% bounce

Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first

Fix: Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Navigation (2)

No skip-to-content link

+1% bounce

Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page

Fix: Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

1 broken link(s) on the page

+2% bounce

Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends

Fix: Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Return on Investment

BRL 720 investment → BRL 3,574/month returns + BRL 50,000,000 risk avoided

Payback period: < 1 month First-year ROI: +5857%

Investment

BRL 720

4h · 5 findings

Monthly returns

BRL 3,574 /mo

~BRL 42,891 / year

Conversions recovered BRL 3,571
Bandwidth savings BRL 3.17

Regulatory risk avoided

BRL 50,000,000

if kept compliant

LGPD BRL 50,000,000

Payback period

0 12mo 24mo

BRL 360 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Full methodology & sources

Estimated Remediation Cost

R$720

4.0 developer hours at R$180/hr

Based on Brazil rates (R$180/hr)

Quick wins

R$360 4 fixes in ~120 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Custom rate

R$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

What Inaction Is Costing You

BRL 4,166,670 / month at risk

~BRL 50,000,038 / year if left unfixed

Compliance Risk

BRL 50,000,000

LGPD

No privacy policy link detected
LGPD: BRL 10,000 – BRL 50,000,000
1 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
LGPD: BRL 10,000 – BRL 50,000,000
Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
LGPD: BRL 10,000 – BRL 50,000,000

+2 more

Bandwidth Waste

BRL 3.17 /mo

7731.3 MB/mo × 0.410 BRL/GB

Optimize transfer: save ~773 KB per page load
Saves BRL 3.17/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Monthly visitors

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Conversion rate (%)

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Avg. order value

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue

Current bounce (est.)

After fixes (est.)

Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Was this report useful?

Thanks for your feedback!

We'll use a cached audit if available, or offer to scan.

Checking for existing audit...

Press ? for shortcuts

Lighthouse Scores

Industry-standard audits powered by Google Lighthouse.

Performance

100

Accessibility

Best Practices

100

SEO

Core Web Vitals

Key metrics that affect user experience.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.32 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.38 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

754 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.32 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

19.21 s

Detailed Report

Audit breakdown by category with detailed findings.

Performance

Insights

Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile Baseline features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling

Why this matters

Shipping ES5 transpiled code to modern browsers wastes bytes — every user with an evergreen browser pays for compatibility you don't need.

Learn more ▾

Most users today run browsers that natively support ES6+, async/await, optional chaining, and the rest of modern JavaScript. Transpiling to ES5 'just in case' adds 20-40% to your bundle for no benefit. Configure your build to target a modern browserslist, or ship a differential bundle pair (modern + legacy) with the module/nomodule pattern.

Source: Google web.dev / Lighthouse

3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code to prioritize your page's content.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Your first network request is the most important. Reduce its latency by avoiding redirects, ensuring a fast server response, and enabling text compression.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about forced reflows and possible mitigations.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

headings: [map[key:source label:Source valueType:source-location] map[granularity:1 key:reflowTime label:Total reflow time valueType:ms]]

items: [map[reflowTime:33.913 source:map[type:text value:[unattributed]]]]

Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

	URL	Resource Size	Est Savings
body > main.site-main > section.banner-promo > img.bannerMobile `body > main.site-main > section.banner-promo > img.bannerMobile`	/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/VITRINE-ABRIL-MOBILE-490-x-12...	380.5 KiB	371.0 KiB
Veja Negócios `div#card-veja-negocios > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/veja_negocios_impresso.jpg?resi...	79.8 KiB	70.4 KiB
Quatro Rodas `div#card-quatro-rodas > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/4rodas_impresso.jpg?resize=209,...	73.2 KiB	63.9 KiB
Claudia `div#card-claudia > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/claudia_impresso.jpg?resize=209...	68.2 KiB	58.8 KiB
Viagem e Turismo `div#card-viagem-e-turismo > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/viagem_e_turismo_impresso.jpg?r...	65.4 KiB	56.0 KiB
Veja `div#card-veja > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/veja_impresso.jpg?resize=209,27...	56.3 KiB	47.0 KiB
Veja Saúde `div#card-veja-saude > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/saude_impresso.jpg?resize=209,2...	54.8 KiB	45.4 KiB
Super `div#card-super > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/super_impresso.jpg?resize=209,2...	49.0 KiB	39.6 KiB
Guia do Estudante `div#card-guia-do-estudante > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/guiadoestudante_impresso.jpg?re...	47.5 KiB	38.2 KiB
Você S/A `div#card-voce-s-a > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/voce_sa_impresso.jpg?resize=209...	45.6 KiB	36.2 KiB
VEJA + ZERO HORA `div#card-veja-zero-hora > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/veja_zero_hora_impresso.jpg?res...	33.9 KiB	24.6 KiB
Piauí `div#card-piaui > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/piaui_impresso.jpg?resize=209,2...	33.2 KiB	23.9 KiB
Você RH `div#card-voce-rh > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/vocerh_impresso.jpg?resize=209,...	32.8 KiB	23.4 KiB
GOREAD `div#card-goread > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/goread_impresso.jpg?resize=209,...	29.8 KiB	20.4 KiB
selo reclame aqui `footer > div.rlinks > div.container > img.selo-ra`	/wp-content/themes/abril-assine/imagem/AssineAbril/novo/r...	22.1 KiB	17.0 KiB

Avoid chaining critical requests by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

description: [preconnect](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-rel-preconnect/) hints help the browser establish a connection earlier in the page load, saving time when the first request for that origin is made. The following are the origins that the page preconnected to.

title: Preconnected origins

description: Add [preconnect](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-rel-preconnect/) hints to your most important origins, but try to use no more than 4.

title: Preconnect candidates

value: No additional origins are good candidates for preconnecting

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more about caching.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Request	Cache TTL	Transfer Size
connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js	1200.0 s	96.6 KiB
indexa-matomo.up.railway.app/js/container_ZKMdwPd9.js	0.0 ms	41.0 KiB
cdn.indexanetwork.com.br/idx_grupoabril.js	3600.0 s	24.0 KiB
www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js	7200.0 s	20.9 KiB
js.go2sdk.com/v2/tune.js	0.0 ms	4.5 KiB
sb.scorecardresearch.com/internal-cs/default/beacon-and.js	86400.0 s	7.8 KiB
m.stalkoda.com/?t=0.2373662759166818	0.0 ms	1.9 KiB
/97feb7bd-f165-49a5-b99f-105ef445d7d0/launchpad-liveramp.js	0.0 ms	1.5 KiB
/src/script/tag/smp_abril?ts4=1776812038249&height_px=823...	0.0 ms	1.2 KiB
stalkoda.com/code/	0.0 ms	745 B
/?id=62c36dfe-b991-ac5a-357d-7b5d22b6196d&width=412&heigh...	0.0 ms	499 B
smct.co/tm/?t=abril.com.br	900.0 s	188 B
blend.host/resources/scripts/src/bl_abril.js	0.0 ms	137 B

Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. Deferring or inlining can move these network requests out of the critical path.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

URL	Transfer Size
/_static/??-eJyVjksOwjAMRC9EahCoZYM4S5qY1iI/ZVwhbk8UNizpy...	4.6 KiB

These insights are also available in the Chrome DevTools Performance Panel - record a trace to view more detailed information.

Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn how to avoid page redirects.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Estimated savings: 1.1 s

URL	Time Spent
abril.com.br/	1.1 s
assine.abril.com.br/?redirect=abrilcom	0.0 ms

Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

TTI

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Diagnostics

Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript.

Why this matters

Multi-megabyte JavaScript bundles delay every interactive feature on the page.

Learn more ▾

This is the Lighthouse audit fired when too much JS is shipped relative to what executes. The fix isn't a config flag — it requires bundle analysis (webpack-bundle-analyzer, rollup-plugin-visualizer), splitting routes into chunks, lazy-loading off-screen components, and removing unused dependencies. Fundamentally different from minification: minifying reduces byte count, this reduces what's downloaded at all.

Source: Google web.dev / Lighthouse

Estimated savings: 260 ms 537.4 KiB

URL	Transfer Size	Est Savings
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/destination?id=AW-&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	134.1 KiB	78.3 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0HTYQ9ZBSJ&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	175.0 KiB	70.1 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-54VSH8Q	160.9 KiB	66.3 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-G1XWXZTWTS	170.4 KiB	64.8 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-89742635-34&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	125.0 KiB	63.9 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-1938110-12&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	115.7 KiB	63.6 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0LTQ9XJNRP&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	145.9 KiB	61.6 KiB
connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js	96.5 KiB	46.1 KiB
/wp-content/themes/abril-assine/assets/js/jquery-3.7.0.mi...	30.7 KiB	22.7 KiB

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn how to reduce Javascript execution time.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

URL	Total CPU Time	Script Evaluation	Script Parse
assine.abril.com.br/?redirect=abrilcom	293 ms	55 ms	15 ms
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-G1XWXZTWTS	293 ms	248 ms	38 ms
Unattributable	267 ms	6.4 ms	0.0 ms
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0HTYQ9ZBSJ&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	260 ms	215 ms	42 ms
www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-54VSH8Q	234 ms	186 ms	41 ms
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0LTQ9XJNRP&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	196 ms	163 ms	31 ms
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-89742635-34&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	127 ms	98 ms	28 ms
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/destination?id=AW-&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	110 ms	82 ms	28 ms
www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js	105 ms	79 ms	26 ms
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-1938110-12&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	104 ms	77 ms	26 ms
connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js	103 ms	76 ms	27 ms
js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-rum-1.313.1.min.js	100 ms	81 ms	3.9 ms
cdn.indexanetwork.com.br/idx_grupoabril.js	67 ms	61 ms	5.3 ms

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn how to minimize main-thread work

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Category	Time Spent
Script Evaluation	1.6 s
Script Parsing & Compilation	355 ms
Other	316 ms
Style & Layout	172 ms
Parse HTML & CSS	33 ms
Rendering	17 ms

Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn how to minify JavaScript.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Estimated savings: 0.0 ms 14.8 KiB

URL	Transfer Size	Est Savings
launchpad.privacymanager.io/latest/launchpad.bundle.js	40.3 KiB	12.7 KiB
inline: if( typeof lgpd_brand == 'unde…	4.6 KiB	2.1 KiB

Set an explicit width and height on image elements to reduce layout shifts and improve CLS. Learn how to set image dimensions

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

	URL
selo reclame aqui `footer > div.rlinks > div.container > img.selo-ra`	/wp-content/themes/abril-assine/imagem/AssineAbril/novo/r...

More information about the performance of your application. These numbers don't directly affect the Performance score.

●Layout shift culprits

●Optimize DOM size

●Font display

●LCP breakdown

●LCP request discovery

●Modern HTTP

●Optimize viewport for mobile

●Minify CSS

●Reduce unused CSS

●Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 2,517 KiB

●User Timing marks and measures 15 user timings

●Avoid long main-thread tasks 13 long tasks found

●Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration

●Network Requests

●Network Round Trip Times 100 ms

●Server Backend Latencies 360 ms

●Tasks

●Diagnostics

●Metrics

●Screenshot Thumbnails

●Final Screenshot

●Script Treemap Data

●Resources Summary

●Initial server response time was short Root document took 0 ms

●Avoid large layout shifts 1 layout shift found

○INP breakdown

○Avoid non-composited animations

100

Accessibility

These checks highlight opportunities to improve the accessibility of your web app. Automatic detection can only detect a subset of issues and does not guarantee the accessibility of your web app, so manual testing is also encouraged.

○Interactive controls are keyboard focusable

○Interactive elements indicate their purpose and state

○The page has a logical tab order

○Visual order on the page follows DOM order

○User focus is not accidentally trapped in a region

○The user's focus is directed to new content added to the page

○HTML5 landmark elements are used to improve navigation

○Offscreen content is hidden from assistive technology

○Custom controls have associated labels

○Custom controls have ARIA roles

●`[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>`

●Image elements have `[alt]` attributes

●`[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5.

●Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio

●Document has a `<title>` element

●`<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute

●`<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute

●Links have a discernible name

●Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`).

●List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements

●Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing.

●Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order

●Document has a main landmark.

●Identical links have the same purpose.

○`[accesskey]` values are unique

○`[aria-*]` attributes match their roles

○`button`, `link`, and `menuitem` elements have accessible names

○ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role

○Deprecated ARIA roles were not used

○Elements with `role="dialog"` or `role="alertdialog"` have accessible names.

○`[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents

○ARIA input fields have accessible names

○ARIA `meter` elements have accessible names

○ARIA `progressbar` elements have accessible names

○Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes

○`[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes

○Elements with an ARIA `[role]` that require children to contain a specific `[role]` have all required children.

○`[role]`s are contained by their required parent element

○`[role]` values are valid

○Elements with the `role=text` attribute do not have focusable descendents.

○ARIA toggle fields have accessible names

○ARIA `tooltip` elements have accessible names

○ARIA `treeitem` elements have accessible names

○`[aria-*]` attributes have valid values

○`[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled

○Buttons have an accessible name

○The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region

○`<dl>`'s contain only properly-ordered `<dt>` and `<dd>` groups, `<script>`, `<template>` or `<div>` elements.

○Definition list items are wrapped in `<dl>` elements

○ARIA IDs are unique

○No form fields have multiple labels

○`<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements have a title

○`<html>` element has an `[xml:lang]` attribute with the same base language as the `[lang]` attribute.

○Input buttons have discernible text.

○`<input type="image">` elements have `[alt]` text

○Form elements have associated labels

○Links are distinguishable without relying on color.

○The document does not use `<meta http-equiv="refresh">`

○`<object>` elements have alternate text

○Select elements have associated label elements.

○Skip links are focusable.

○No element has a `[tabindex]` value greater than 0

○Cells in a `<table>` element that use the `[headers]` attribute refer to table cells within the same table.

○`<th>` elements and elements with `[role="columnheader"/"rowheader"]` have data cells they describe.

○`[lang]` attributes have a valid value

○`<video>` elements contain a `<track>` element with `[kind="captions"]`

○Tables have different content in the summary attribute and `<caption>`.

○All heading elements contain content.

○Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements

○Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text.

○Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names.

○Tables use `<caption>` instead of cells with the `[colspan]` attribute to indicate a caption.

○`<td>` elements in a large `<table>` have one or more table headers.

Best Practices

General

Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Source	Description
blend.host/resources/scripts/src/bl_abril.js	`Uncaught ReferenceError: ADD_NF is not defined`

●Uses HTTPS

●Avoids deprecated APIs

●Avoids third-party cookies

●Allows users to paste into input fields

●Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load

●Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load

●Displays images with correct aspect ratio

●Serves images with appropriate resolution

●Page has the HTML doctype

●Properly defines charset

●No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools

●Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

●Use a strong HSTS policy

●Ensure proper origin isolation with COOP

●Mitigate clickjacking with XFO or CSP

●Mitigate DOM-based XSS with Trusted Types

●Detected JavaScript libraries

●Page has valid source maps

○Redirects HTTP traffic to HTTPS

100

SEO

These checks ensure that your page is following basic search engine optimization advice. There are many additional factors Lighthouse does not score here that may affect your search ranking, including performance on Core Web Vitals. Learn more about Google Search Essentials.

○Structured data is valid

●Page isn’t blocked from indexing

●Document has a `<title>` element

●Document has a meta description

●Page has successful HTTP status code

●Links have descriptive text

●Links are crawlable

●robots.txt is valid

●Image elements have `[alt]` attributes

●Document has a valid `hreflang`

●Document has a valid `rel=canonical`

Lighthouse Scores

Industry-standard audits powered by Google Lighthouse. — Desktop

Performance

100

Accessibility

Best Practices

100

SEO

Core Web Vitals

Key metrics that affect user experience. — Desktop

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

768 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.02 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

6 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

768 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.87 s

Detailed Report

Audit breakdown by category with detailed findings.

Performance

Insights

Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Why this matters

Shipping ES5 transpiled code to modern browsers wastes bytes — every user with an evergreen browser pays for compatibility you don't need.

Learn more ▾

Source: Google web.dev / Lighthouse

3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code to prioritize your page's content.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Your first network request is the most important. Reduce its latency by avoiding redirects, ensuring a fast server response, and enabling text compression.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

headings: [map[key:source label:Source valueType:source-location] map[granularity:1 key:reflowTime label:Total reflow time valueType:ms]]

items: [map[reflowTime:32.77 source:map[type:text value:[unattributed]]]]

Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

	URL	Resource Size	Est Savings
body > main.site-main > section.banner-promo > img.bannerDesktop `body > main.site-main > section.banner-promo > img.bannerDesktop`	/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/VITRINE-ASSINE-1270-x-170-px....	1020.6 KiB	985.5 KiB
Veja Negócios `div#card-veja-negocios > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/veja_negocios_impresso.jpg?resi...	79.8 KiB	70.4 KiB
Quatro Rodas `div#card-quatro-rodas > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/4rodas_impresso.jpg?resize=209,...	73.2 KiB	63.9 KiB
Claudia `div#card-claudia > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/claudia_impresso.jpg?resize=209...	68.2 KiB	58.8 KiB
Viagem e Turismo `div#card-viagem-e-turismo > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/viagem_e_turismo_impresso.jpg?r...	65.4 KiB	56.0 KiB
Veja `div#card-veja > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/veja_impresso.jpg?resize=209,27...	56.3 KiB	47.0 KiB
Veja Saúde `div#card-veja-saude > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/saude_impresso.jpg?resize=209,2...	54.8 KiB	45.4 KiB
Super `div#card-super > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/super_impresso.jpg?resize=209,2...	49.0 KiB	39.6 KiB
Guia do Estudante `div#card-guia-do-estudante > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/guiadoestudante_impresso.jpg?re...	47.5 KiB	38.2 KiB
Você S/A `div#card-voce-s-a > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/voce_sa_impresso.jpg?resize=209...	45.6 KiB	36.2 KiB
VEJA + ZERO HORA `div#card-veja-zero-hora > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/veja_zero_hora_impresso.jpg?res...	33.9 KiB	24.6 KiB
Piauí `div#card-piaui > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/piaui_impresso.jpg?resize=209,2...	33.2 KiB	23.9 KiB
Você RH `div#card-voce-rh > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/vocerh_impresso.jpg?resize=209,...	32.8 KiB	23.4 KiB
selo reclame aqui `div.rlinks > div.container > div.rcol1 > img.selo-ra`	/wp-content/themes/abril-assine/imagem/AssineAbril/novo/r...	22.1 KiB	21.2 KiB
GOREAD `div#card-goread > div.card-body > a.card-capa > img`	/wp-content/uploads/capas/goread_impresso.jpg?resize=209,...	29.8 KiB	20.4 KiB

Avoid chaining critical requests by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

title: Preconnected origins

description: Add [preconnect](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-rel-preconnect/) hints to your most important origins, but try to use no more than 4.

title: Preconnect candidates

value: No additional origins are good candidates for preconnecting

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more about caching.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Request	Cache TTL	Transfer Size
connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js	1200.0 s	96.6 KiB
indexa-matomo.up.railway.app/js/container_ZKMdwPd9.js	0.0 ms	41.0 KiB
cdn.indexanetwork.com.br/idx_grupoabril.js	3600.0 s	24.0 KiB
www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js	7200.0 s	20.9 KiB
js.go2sdk.com/v2/tune.js	0.0 ms	4.5 KiB
sb.scorecardresearch.com/internal-cs/default/beacon.js	86400.0 s	6.7 KiB
m.stalkoda.com/?t=0.5276019246347426	0.0 ms	1.9 KiB
/97feb7bd-f165-49a5-b99f-105ef445d7d0/launchpad-liveramp.js	0.0 ms	1.5 KiB
stalkoda.com/code/	0.0 ms	753 B
/?id=e79e8262-6dc6-7bfe-de6e-f1d3eaa94ef9&width=1350&heig...	0.0 ms	501 B
smct.co/tm/?t=abril.com.br	900.0 s	188 B
blend.host/resources/scripts/src/bl_abril.js	0.0 ms	137 B

Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. Deferring or inlining can move these network requests out of the critical path.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

URL	Transfer Size
/_static/??-eJyVjksOwjAMRC9EahCoZYM4S5qY1iI/ZVwhbk8UNizpy...	4.6 KiB

These insights are also available in the Chrome DevTools Performance Panel - record a trace to view more detailed information.

Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn how to avoid page redirects.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Estimated savings: 474 ms

URL	Time Spent
abril.com.br/	474 ms
assine.abril.com.br/?redirect=abrilcom	0.0 ms

Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

TTI

Diagnostics

Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn how to minify JavaScript.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Estimated savings: 0.0 ms 14.8 KiB

URL	Transfer Size	Est Savings
launchpad.privacymanager.io/latest/launchpad.bundle.js	40.3 KiB	12.7 KiB
inline: if( typeof lgpd_brand == 'unde…	4.6 KiB	2.1 KiB

Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript.

Why this matters

Multi-megabyte JavaScript bundles delay every interactive feature on the page.

Learn more ▾

Source: Google web.dev / Lighthouse

Estimated savings: 20 ms 651.0 KiB

URL	Transfer Size	Est Savings
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-G1XWXZTWTS&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	169.3 KiB	113.9 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/destination?id=AW-&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1h1	134.1 KiB	78.3 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0HTYQ9ZBSJ&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	175.0 KiB	70.1 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-G1XWXZTWTS	170.4 KiB	65.9 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-54VSH8Q	161.2 KiB	64.4 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-89742635-34&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1h1	124.9 KiB	63.7 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-1938110-12&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1h1	115.7 KiB	63.6 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0LTQ9XJNRP&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1h1	145.9 KiB	62.3 KiB
connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js	96.5 KiB	46.1 KiB
/wp-content/themes/abril-assine/assets/js/jquery-3.7.0.mi...	30.7 KiB	22.7 KiB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn how to reduce payload sizes.

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

URL	Transfer Size
/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/VITRINE-ASSINE-1270-x-170-px....	1022.0 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0HTYQ9ZBSJ&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	175.1 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-G1XWXZTWTS	170.5 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-G1XWXZTWTS&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1	169.4 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-54VSH8Q	161.6 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0LTQ9XJNRP&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1h1	145.9 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/destination?id=AW-&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1h1	134.1 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-89742635-34&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1h1	124.9 KiB
www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-1938110-12&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1h1	115.7 KiB
connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js	96.6 KiB

Set an explicit width and height on image elements to reduce layout shifts and improve CLS. Learn how to set image dimensions

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

	URL
selo reclame aqui `div.rlinks > div.container > div.rcol1 > img.selo-ra`	/wp-content/themes/abril-assine/imagem/AssineAbril/novo/r...

More information about the performance of your application. These numbers don't directly affect the Performance score.

●Layout shift culprits

●Optimize DOM size

●Font display

●LCP breakdown

●LCP request discovery

●Modern HTTP

●Optimize viewport for mobile

●Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms

●Minify CSS

●Reduce unused CSS

●User Timing marks and measures 15 user timings

●JavaScript execution time 0.2 s

●Minimizes main-thread work 0.7 s

●Avoid long main-thread tasks 1 long task found

●Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration

●Network Requests

●Network Round Trip Times 100 ms

●Server Backend Latencies 340 ms

●Tasks

●Diagnostics

●Metrics

●Screenshot Thumbnails

●Final Screenshot

●Script Treemap Data

●Resources Summary

●Initial server response time was short Root document took 0 ms

●Avoid large layout shifts 1 layout shift found

○INP breakdown

○Avoid non-composited animations

100

Accessibility

○Interactive controls are keyboard focusable

○Interactive elements indicate their purpose and state

○The page has a logical tab order

○Visual order on the page follows DOM order

○User focus is not accidentally trapped in a region

○The user's focus is directed to new content added to the page

○HTML5 landmark elements are used to improve navigation

○Offscreen content is hidden from assistive technology

○Custom controls have associated labels

○Custom controls have ARIA roles

●`[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>`

●Image elements have `[alt]` attributes

●`[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5.

●Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio

●Document has a `<title>` element

●`<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute

●`<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute

●Links have a discernible name

●Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`).

●List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements

●Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing.

●Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order

●Document has a main landmark.

●Identical links have the same purpose.

○`[accesskey]` values are unique

○`[aria-*]` attributes match their roles

○`button`, `link`, and `menuitem` elements have accessible names

○ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role

○Deprecated ARIA roles were not used

○Elements with `role="dialog"` or `role="alertdialog"` have accessible names.

○`[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents

○ARIA input fields have accessible names

○ARIA `meter` elements have accessible names

○ARIA `progressbar` elements have accessible names

○Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes

○`[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes

○Elements with an ARIA `[role]` that require children to contain a specific `[role]` have all required children.

○`[role]`s are contained by their required parent element

○`[role]` values are valid

○Elements with the `role=text` attribute do not have focusable descendents.

○ARIA toggle fields have accessible names

○ARIA `tooltip` elements have accessible names

○ARIA `treeitem` elements have accessible names

○`[aria-*]` attributes have valid values

○`[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled

○Buttons have an accessible name

○The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region

○`<dl>`'s contain only properly-ordered `<dt>` and `<dd>` groups, `<script>`, `<template>` or `<div>` elements.

○Definition list items are wrapped in `<dl>` elements

○ARIA IDs are unique

○No form fields have multiple labels

○`<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements have a title

○`<html>` element has an `[xml:lang]` attribute with the same base language as the `[lang]` attribute.

○Input buttons have discernible text.

○`<input type="image">` elements have `[alt]` text

○Form elements have associated labels

○Links are distinguishable without relying on color.

○The document does not use `<meta http-equiv="refresh">`

○`<object>` elements have alternate text

○Select elements have associated label elements.

○Skip links are focusable.

○No element has a `[tabindex]` value greater than 0

○Cells in a `<table>` element that use the `[headers]` attribute refer to table cells within the same table.

○`<th>` elements and elements with `[role="columnheader"/"rowheader"]` have data cells they describe.

○`[lang]` attributes have a valid value

○`<video>` elements contain a `<track>` element with `[kind="captions"]`

○Tables have different content in the summary attribute and `<caption>`.

○All heading elements contain content.

○Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements

○Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text.

○Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names.

○Tables use `<caption>` instead of cells with the `[colspan]` attribute to indicate a caption.

○`<td>` elements in a large `<table>` have one or more table headers.

Best Practices

General

Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit

Why this matters

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Source	Description
blend.host/resources/scripts/src/bl_abril.js	`Uncaught ReferenceError: ADD_NF is not defined`

●Uses HTTPS

●Avoids deprecated APIs

●Avoids third-party cookies

●Allows users to paste into input fields

●Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load

●Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load

●Displays images with correct aspect ratio

●Serves images with appropriate resolution

●Page has the HTML doctype

●Properly defines charset

●No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools

●Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

●Use a strong HSTS policy

●Ensure proper origin isolation with COOP

●Mitigate clickjacking with XFO or CSP

●Mitigate DOM-based XSS with Trusted Types

●Detected JavaScript libraries

●Page has valid source maps

○Redirects HTTP traffic to HTTPS

100

SEO

○Structured data is valid

●Page isn’t blocked from indexing

●Document has a `<title>` element

●Document has a meta description

●Page has successful HTTP status code

●Links have descriptive text

●Links are crawlable

●robots.txt is valid

●Image elements have `[alt]` attributes

●Document has a valid `hreflang`

●Document has a valid `rel=canonical`

Results for https://abril.com.br

Site Health

How you compare

Top Priorities (5)

Fix Priority Matrix

Quick Wins

Strategic

Easy Improvements

Deprioritize

What fixing these means

Conversion Barriers

Speed (2)

Trust (2)

Content (2)

Navigation (2)

Return on Investment

Investment

Monthly returns

Regulatory risk avoided

Payback period

Estimated Remediation Cost

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

What Inaction Is Costing You

Compliance Risk

Bandwidth Waste

Lighthouse Scores

Core Web Vitals

Detailed Report

Performance

Insights

Diagnostics

Accessibility

Best Practices

General

SEO

Lighthouse Scores

Core Web Vitals

Detailed Report

Performance

Insights

Diagnostics

Accessibility

Best Practices

General

SEO

Keyboard Shortcuts