Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 1032ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (383ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1603ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
master-220v.ru fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
Missing <html lang> attribute -- screen readers default to the user's system language and pronounce content with the wrong phonetics.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
₽19,250 investment → ₽209,899/month returns
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.
- Page takes 12.8s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 10.3s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
- No structured dataNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices→ Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Bounce-Rate Cost
₽157 501 /mo
+26.3pp bounce · ~2,625 lost visitors/mo
CPC: RUB 60.00
Bandwidth Waste
₽54 /mo
7476.9 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~748 KB per page loadSaves ₽54/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.48 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
12.80 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
199 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.006
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.41 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
12.80 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
803 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.28 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.182
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.16 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.28 s
Categories
8Performance
1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of jQuery sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Google Font API, on PHP, with Nginx CDN
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Yandex.Metrika 
Google Font API 
jQuery 3.1.0
PHP 5.6.40
Nginx All Detected Technologies (7)
Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Yandex.Metrica is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Observations (3)
Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header
The X-Powered-By header reveals 'PHP 5.6.40'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.
No build tool detected
A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
PHP version may be outdated
Detected PHP 5.6.40. The current major version is 8. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/master-220v.ru)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/master-220v.ru"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaster-220v.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaster-220v.ruExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (87)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
- · No <main> landmark found
- · HSTS header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer