Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
/.svn/entries is publicly accessible
Sensitive resource publicly accessible — restrict access or remove.
100 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
19 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
2 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
95 image-in-link without alt text
Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
₫2,400,000 investment → ₫136,252,277/month returns + VND 100,000,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
11 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~40%.
- Page takes 6.1s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 3.6s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.4sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No viewport meta tagMobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature→ Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
- 15 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
VND 100,000,000
- No privacy policy link detectedPDPD: VND 10,000,000 – VND 100,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundPDPD: VND 10,000,000 – VND 100,000,000
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundPDPD: VND 10,000,000 – VND 100,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
₫115,725,005 /mo
+39.9pp bounce · ~3,991 lost visitors/mo
CPC: VND 29000.00
Bandwidth Waste
₫13,327 /mo
6663.4 MB/mo × 2000.000 VND/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~666 KB per page loadSaves ₫13,327/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.52 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
6.11 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.44 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.102
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
9.15 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
19.45 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.07 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.33 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
80 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.061
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
4.85 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
7.82 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
/.svn/entries is publicly accessible
Accessibility
100 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 55 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of core-js sites score 72+ on Accessibility; you're at 39 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Google Search Console, hosted on Tengine
Stack Architecture
Cart Functionality 
MobX 
React 16.8.0
Swiper 
core-js 2.6.12
web-vitals 
Tengine All Detected Technologies (10)
Tengine is a web server which is based on the Nginx HTTP server.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.
Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
The web-vitals JavaScript is a tiny, modular library for measuring all the web vitals metrics on real users.
Observations (3)
No build tool detected
A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
React version may be outdated
Detected React 16.8.0. The current major version is 18. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/lazada.vn)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/lazada.vn"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flazada.vn" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flazada.vnExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 4h total → projected C (75)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 19 link(s) with no accessible text
- · 2 button(s) with no accessible text
- · 95 image-in-link without alt text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+4Medium effort, high structural impact
- · /.svn/entries is publicly accessible
- · 100 image(s) missing alt attribute