Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Performance, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Page weighs 11.2 MB (4.7 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
2 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
3 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
9 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€269 investment → €7,340/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.
- Page takes 23.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 21.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 2.0sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 3 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
- 3 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€20.500.000
- 2 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- No <main> landmark foundEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- 1 of 3 <nav> elements are unlabeledEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€7.338 /mo
+33.4pp bounce · ~3,336 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€1,08 /mo
14633.2 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page loadSaves €1,08/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
8.74 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
23.71 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
2.02 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
9.08 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
25.60 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.23 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.28 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
180 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.012
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.94 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.45 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 11.2 MB (4.7 MB transferred)
Security
All checks pass
Accessibility
2 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Webflow 1.6.0, hosted on AWS, with AWS CloudFront CDN
Stack Architecture
Adobe Analytics 
Adobe Experience Platform Launch 
DoubleClick Floodlight 
Ensighten 
Facebook Pixel 
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
HubSpot 
Linkedin Insight Tag 
Microsoft Advertising 
Profitwell 
Split 10.24.1
Webflow 1.6.0
Adobe Fonts 1.21.0Amazon Route 53 
Bootstrap 
Chili Piper 
ClickCease 
Exponea Facebook SDK Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS 
Open Graph 
Sentry 
ServiceNow 
Tailwind CSS 
Typekit 1.21.0Zendesk 
core-js 3.32.2
jQuery 3.5.1
AWS CloudFront Amazon CloudFront 
AWS Amazon Web Services All Detected Technologies (35)
Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.
Webflow is Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) for website building and hosting.
Adobe Fonts is a web-based service providing access to a vast library of high-quality fonts for web and print design.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
Chili Piper is a suite of automated scheduling tools that help revenue teams convert leads.
ClickCease is an ad fraud and click-fraud detection and protection service software.
Exponea is a cloud-based marketing analysis platform suitable for large and midsize organisations in a variety of industries.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.
ServiceNow is a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.
Typekit is an online service which offers a subscription library of fonts.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Adobe Analytics is a web analytics, marketing and cross-channel analytics application.
Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.
Ensighten is a solution that enables secure management, implementation and control of website technologies.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
HubSpot is a marketing and sales software that helps companies attract visitors, convert leads, and close customers.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Microsoft Advertising is an online advertising platform developed by Microsoft.
Split is a feature delivery platform that powers feature flag management, software experimentation, and continuous delivery.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Adobe Fonts) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
35 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/4097c6c4-9fb5-4823-aa72-fbaa9488a6f2)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/4097c6c4-9fb5-4823-aa72-fbaa9488a6f2"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclickcease.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclickcease.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 3h total → projected B (81)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 11.2 MB (4.7 MB transferred)
- · No <main> landmark found
- · 9 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 3 control(s) without accessible label
- · 2 image(s) missing alt attribute