Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-05 21:26 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.3m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Excellent global latency — average 71ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (15ms), slowest from Amsterdam (305ms). No CDN (document or assets).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
45ms
DNS 35ms · TLS 4ms
United States - Santa Clara
17ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 4ms
United Stated - New York
26ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 6ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
305ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 89ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
21ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 6ms
Singapore - Singapore
15ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 5ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 71ms · Cache: max-age=60

Audit overview

Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

apple.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 12.1 MB (6.4 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

8 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 17.1s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 17.1s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$1,267 investment → $6,773/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$1,267
12.7 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$6,773
$81,270/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6316% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$1,250 → 0.2 mo payback · +6402% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$67 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
5
2 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
71
B
Speed
1
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 17.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 14.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 4 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • 8 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")
    Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance
    → Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$1,267 12.7 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$67 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$6,773 / month at risk ~$81,270 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No H1 heading found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H5 (missing H3)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,771 /mo

+25.2pp bounce · ~2,517 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.61 /mo

20081.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.0 MB per page load
    Saves $1.61/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

59
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
79
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.13 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

17.08 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

7.48 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

17.72 s

Desktop

71
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
79
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

725 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.71 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.64 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.85 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Framework · 2106 peers
You 81
·
Avg 76
At average
0 50 100
Better than 74% of Framework sites
HSTS · 3294 peers
You 81
·
Avg 78
At average
0 50 100
Sustainability P20Accessibility P75Security P71SEO P37Content P38Infrastructure P56Performance P55Compliance P48

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on Sustainability; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 71% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Apple MapKit JS

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Adobe Analytics
Framework
Apple MapKit JS HSTS Open Graph ServiceNow jQuery 3.6.0

All Detected Technologies (6)

Apple MapKit JS lets you embed interactive maps directly into your websites across platforms and operating systems, including iOS and Android.

Categories Maps Website https://developer.apple.com/maps/web/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

ServiceNow is a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.servicenow.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://developer.apple.com/assets/scripts/lib/jquery/jquery-3.6.0.min.js?35212621148
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Analytics is a web analytics, marketing and cross-channel analytics application.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.adobe.com/analytics/adobe-analytics.html Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple MapKit JS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.apple.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/apple.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/apple.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.apple.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.apple.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 13h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (87)
  • · Page weighs 12.1 MB (6.4 MB transferred)
  • · No H1 heading found
  • · 8 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+5

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → A (92)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback