Skip to content
https://www.tradingtitans007.sbs Export & share
Scanned
2026-10-23 15:31 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 1290ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (826ms), slowest from Madrid (1608ms). Document on Netlify; assets also on Cloudflare. 6 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
1608ms
DNS 192ms · TLS 160ms
United Stated - New York
826ms
DNS 449ms · TLS 125ms
Singapore - Singapore
865ms
DNS 190ms · TLS 400ms
United States - Santa Clara
1278ms
DNS 143ms · TLS 88ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1584ms
DNS 317ms · TLS 143ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
1580ms
DNS 171ms · TLS 136ms
CDN: Netlify ("Netlify Edge"; fwd=miss; fwd-status=200; stored) · document + assets · Avg TTFB: 1290ms · Cache: public,max-age=0,must-revalidate

Audit overview

Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

tradingtitans007.sbs fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Page weighs 10.6 MB (7.8 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 3

2 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

2 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 9.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 9.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€425 investment → €14,793/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€425
5.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€14.793
€177.519/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+41669% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€383 → 0.0 mo payback · +46310% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€85 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
6
3 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
61
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 9.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.3s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 2 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€425 5.0 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€85 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€9.834 / month at risk ~€118.003 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

GDPREAA
  • 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 1 image(s) with generic alt text
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€9.832 /mo

+30.3pp bounce · ~3,034 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 3.24

Bandwidth Waste

€1,81 /mo

24428.3 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.4 MB per page load
    Saves €1,81/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

32
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.69 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

9.51 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.29 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

7.72 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

12.49 s

Desktop

79
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

715 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.68 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

43 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.012

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.60 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.69 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

core-js · 1915 peers
You 81
·
Avg 74
+7 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P86Security P81Performance P78Content P78Compliance P31Infrastructure P39SEO P60Sustainability P49

Top 10% of core-js sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →
Facebook SDK · 754 peers
You 81
·
Avg 73
+8 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P90Performance P89Security P84Content P77Compliance P27Infrastructure P39SEO P61Sustainability P57

Top 10% of Facebook SDK sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of Facebook SDK sites See full Facebook SDK benchmark →

Technology stack

Facebook SDK, with Netlify CDN

21 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Pixel 2.9.427 Google Ads Google Ads Conversion Tracking Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Facebook SDK Framer Motion Google Font API Google Search Console HSTS Lenis 1.3.26 Lucide Open Graph Priority Hints React React Router 6 Tailwind CSS Vite core-js 3.32.2
CDN
Netlify Netlify CDN

All Detected Technologies (21)

Netlify providers hosting and server-less backend services for web applications and static websites.

Categories PaaS, CDN Website https://www.netlify.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-nf-request-id, Server: Netlify
Categories CDN Website https://www.netlify.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-nf-request-id: 01M5MP4AHFRDFFF49Y8978M70J
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains connect.facebook.net: https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/1227609552348601?v=2.9.427&r=stable&domain=www.tradingtitans007.sbs&hme=766752a074f0cb0756dd3275a46fdecbcfe3de1ab8f573546734b619e44d384f&ex_m=118%2C241%2C171%2C27%2C82%2C83%2C162%2C78%2C77%2C11%2C181%2C102%2C20%2C153%2C141%2C46%2C85%2C90%2C149%2C176%2C183%2C8%2C4%2C5%2C7%2C6%2C3%2C103%2C115%2C32%2C17%2C31%2C18%2C33%2C34%2C35%2C37%2C55%2C163%2C87%2C126%2C22%2C24%2C51%2C47%2C49%2C48%2C95%2C104%2C108%2C124%2C160%2C164%2C53%2C125%2C29%2C26%2C133%2C79%2C43%2C166%2C165%2C167%2C157%2C155%2C30%2C42%2C66%2C123%2C178%2C80%2C21%2C128%2C93%2C76%2C23%2C97%2C98%2C130%2C96%2C151%2C150%2C154%2C109%2C177%2C180%2C41%2C56%2C127%2C54%2C161%2C72%2C185%2C110%2C184%2C210%2C255%2C84%2C274%2C273%2C272%2C14%2C25%2C28%2C40%2C62%2C117%2C68%2C10%2C73%2C111%2C112%2C113%2C119%2C144%2C38%2C36%2C146%2C147%2C148%2C143%2C142%2C172%2C86%2C175%2C173%2C174%2C57%2C69%2C67%2C137%2C19%2C179%2C52%2C324%2C325%2C326%2C323%2C340%2C362%2C248%2C237%2C70%2C238%2C236%2C365%2C356%2C59%2C249%2C121%2C145%2C92%2C135%2C61%2C134%2C140%2C139%2C65%2C74%2C168%2C88%2C89%2C129%2C44%2C39%2C60%2C63%2C114%2C182%2C1%2C138%2C16%2C136%2C12%2C2%2C64%2C105%2C15%2C75%2C71%2C132%2C101%2C100%2C187%2C188%2C106%2C107%2C9%2C116%2C186%2C58%2C158%2C99%2C91%2C81%2C131%2C120%2C169%2C50%2C159%2C0%2C94%2C152%2C156%2C170%2C45%2C122%2C13%2C189

Framer Motion is a modern animation library for JavaScript, React, and Vue.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://motion.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=EyqmvJdLEwYCYHpD9WTSmkw75p9wmqYhBEFoOPwEkwg

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Lenis is a smooth scroll library to normalise the scrolling experience across devices.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website http://lenis.darkroom.engineering Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 602 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Vite is a rapid development tool for modern web projects.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://vitejs.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.

Categories Analytics Website https://facebook.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Ads is an online advertising platform developed by Google.

Categories Advertising Website https://ads.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Ads Conversion Tracking is a free tool that shows you what happens after a customer interacts with your ads.

Categories Analytics Website https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/1722022 Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-17963921837&cx=c&gtm=4e6al1

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Facebook SDK) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradingtitans007.sbs)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/tradingtitans007.sbs)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/tradingtitans007.sbs"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradingtitans007.sbs" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradingtitans007.sbs

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · Page weighs 10.6 MB (7.8 MB transferred)
  • · 2 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → B (89)
  • · 2 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback