Skip to content
FR · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: RGPD · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €80/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-07 20:40 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 4

is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Image Optimization
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 13.2s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 13.2s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€740 investment → €7,296/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€740
9.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€7.296
€87.553/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11732% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5000.1 mo payback · +17411% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€20 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 13.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 10.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 436ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€740 9.3 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€20 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.112 / month at risk ~€73.350 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveRGPDEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.112 /mo

+27.8pp bounce · ~2,778 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,47 /mo

6280.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~628 KB per page load
    Saves €0,47/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

47
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

6.42 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.16 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

436 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

7.34 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

13.42 s

Desktop

78
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.21 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.95 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.034

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.85 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.99 s

Categories

8
Avg score 73.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 72
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P7Content P10Security P14Infrastructure P21SEO P27Accessibility P71Performance P58Sustainability P51

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 27% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Tailwind CSS · 1316 peers
You 72
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Content P5Compliance P6Security P9Infrastructure P16SEO P32Accessibility P64Performance P56Sustainability P47

Top 10% of Tailwind CSS sites score 97+ on Content; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 19% of Tailwind CSS sites See full Tailwind CSS benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap, with F5 BigIP CDN

10 technologies detected 4 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
AT Internet Analyzer AT Internet XiTi Commanders Act TagCommander Dynatrace Dynatrace RUM Piano Analytics
Build
Piano
Framework
Bootstrap Tailwind CSS
CDN
F5 BigIP

All Detected Technologies (10)

F5's BIG-IP is a family of products covering software and hardware designed around application availability, access control, and security solutions.

Categories Reverse proxies Website https://www.f5.com/products/big-ip-services Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 3 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 7 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML
Categories Analytics Website https://atinternet.com/en Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Website https://atinternet.com/en Detected by BeaverCheck

Commanders Act TagCommander is a European company providing a tag management product designed to handle website tags.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.commandersact.com/en/solutions/tagcommander/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Dynatrace is a technology company that produces a software intelligence platform based on artificial intelligence to monitor and optimise application performance and development, IT infrastructure, and user experience for businesses and government agencies throughout the world.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.dynatrace.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Dynatrace RUM is an AI powered, full stack, automated real user monitoring platform built by Dynatrace.

Categories RUM Website https://www.dynatrace.com/platform/real-user-monitoring Detected by BeaverCheck

Piano Analytics is a data integration platform that consolidates marketing analytics, product analytics, content analytics, transaction data, and first-party data to offer a centralised source for reporting and segmentation.

Categories Analytics Website https://piano.io/product/analytics/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Piano is a enterprise SaaS company which specialising in advanced media business processes and ecommerce optimisation.

Categories Personalisation Website https://piano.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pole-emploi.fr)](https://beavercheck.com/results/4306a60a-5418-c341-06b6-d358a085aadb)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/4306a60a-5418-c341-06b6-d358a085aadb"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pole-emploi.fr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pole-emploi.fr

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 9h total → projected C (79)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → C (74)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

4 findings 9h → C (79)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Send Feedback