Skip to content
https://beavercheck.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
99
TTFB improving ↑
907ms
FCP stable →
1.2s
LCP stable →
1.6s
Scanned
2026-05-08 20:43 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev
no change

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 600ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (62ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1219ms). No CDN detected. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Netherlands - Amsterdam
Full audit
62ms
DNS 26ms · TLS 10ms
Spain - Madrid
109ms
DNS 28ms · TLS 22ms
United Stated - New York
455ms
DNS 151ms · TLS 78ms
United States - Santa Clara
905ms
DNS 307ms · TLS 153ms
Singapore - Singapore
847ms
DNS 184ms · TLS 169ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1219ms
DNS 420ms · TLS 202ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 600ms · Cache: max-age=60

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Warning: 1

17 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
Warning: 2

Page weight 1.4 MB exceeds 1 MB target by 423 KB

Page weight over the 1 MB target — image optimization is usually the biggest single lever.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 3

Unattributable: 643ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 4

https://beavercheck.com/: 2031ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 5

https://beavercheck.com/static/js/alpine.min.js?v=...: 440ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your page blocks user input for 248ms — visitors may think the site is frozen. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
4 performance issues — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€640 investment → €903/month returns + EUR 120,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
€640
8.0 h · 2 findings
Monthly returns
€903
€10,839/yr
Payback
0.7 mo
+1594% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120,000,000

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

1 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~3%.

Barriers
1
1 warn
Bounce delta
+3pp
added vs baseline
Score
97
A+
Speed
1
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
0
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 248ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€640 8.0 developer hours at €80/hr

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€10,000,903 / month at risk ~€120,010,839 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120,000,000

ePrivacy DirectiveRGPD
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    RGPD: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    RGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    ePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€903 /mo

+3.2pp bounce · ~322 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.80

Bandwidth Waste

€0.33 /mo

4445.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~445 KB per page load
    Saves €0.33/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction
How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

95
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.17 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.30 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

248 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.037

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.17 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.15 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

329 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

517 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

11 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.023

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

476 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

519 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 89.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Alpine.js · 141 peers
You 89
·
Avg 80
+9 above average
0 50 100
Better than 67% of Alpine.js sites See full Alpine.js benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3759 peers
You 89
·
Avg 73
+16 above average
0 50 100
Security P99Accessibility P99SEO P97Content P94Sustainability P87Performance P86Compliance P27Infrastructure P68

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Alpine.js 3.15.9, hosted on OVH, with Nginx CDN

8 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Alpine.js 3.15.9Google Search Console HSTS Htmx 2.0.8 Open Graph Tailwind CSS
CDN
Nginx
Hosting
OVH

All Detected Technologies (8)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns14.ovh.net

Alpine.js is a minimal framework for composing behavior directly in your markup.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://alpinejs.dev Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://beavercheck.com/static/js/alpine.min.js?v=52349c0
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=NC47DemRArx-ButFLPwDDpIqNWExEHflks_cqbvGfi8

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Htmx is a JavaScript library for performing AJAX requests, triggering CSS transitions, and invoking WebSocket and server-sent events directly from HTML elements.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://htmx.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 199 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Alpine.js) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeavercheck.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/432a610d-61ed-44f4-ac97-df67b71370a8)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/432a610d-61ed-44f4-ac97-df67b71370a8"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeavercheck.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeavercheck.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected A (93)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → A (92)
  • · Unattributable: 643ms CPU time
  • · https://beavercheck.com/: 2031ms CPU time
  • · https://beavercheck.com/static/js/alpine.min.js?v=...: 440ms CPU time

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 8h → A (93)
  • · 17 inline style attribute(s) detected
  • · Page weight 1.4 MB exceeds 1 MB target by 423 KB

Send Feedback