Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-15 23:00 UTC
Worker
🇸🇬 Singapore
Duration
1.0m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 2

is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Image Optimization
Warning: 3

151 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 4

152 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 5

Certificate expires soon (13 days remaining)

Cert expiry within the renewal window — fix now while there's no user impact, instead of after expiry when there's a full outage.

Security › TLS & Certificates
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 8.4s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 3 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 8.4s — fixing the 3 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£525 investment → £9,659/month returns + GBP 50,000 risk avoided

Investment
£525
7.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
£9,659
£115,905/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+21977% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 50,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£4880.1 mo payback · +23675% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 8.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 5.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.3s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£525 7.0 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£75 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£6,462 / month at risk ~£77,548 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£50,000

Equality Act 2010
  • Multiple <main> landmarks (2 found)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£6,462 /mo

+30.8pp bounce · ~3,077 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£0.65 /mo

10364.4 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.0 MB per page load
    Saves £0.65/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

42
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.63 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.36 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.29 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.010

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.12 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

16.98 s

Desktop

89
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.02 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.72 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

70 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.009

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.73 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.56 s

Categories

8
Avg score 72.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Amazon Route 53 · 1011 peers
You 72
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
SEO P5Content P6Security P93Compliance P79Infrastructure P28Accessibility P30Performance P32Sustainability P48

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 34% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →
AngularJS · 453 peers
You 72
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Content P2Compliance P98Accessibility P3Sustainability P9Performance P11Infrastructure P14SEO P75Security P72

Top 10% of AngularJS sites score 76+ on Content; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 32% of AngularJS sites See full AngularJS benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon Route 53, with Cloudflare CDN

10 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Amazon Route 53 AngularJS Apple Cloudflare Turnstile Facebook Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Microsoft
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (10)

Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-1447.awsdns-52.org

AngularJS is a JavaScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://angularjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=hiRNMTWYN1yBRwg4

Turnstile is Cloudflare's smart CAPTCHA alternative.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/products/turnstile Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains challenges.cloudflare.com: https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/g/b0a7532ac8ec/api.js?onload=cFyL2&render=explicit
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=15ore8k5t6ft96p6lt8sb02m8dls4w
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=nqX1TPP8SIFG3F_1ULz5qPw7qEqO4Bowh14fkxdESfo
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms15735648

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fft.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/450f1580-aab0-422e-bef6-be47eb320588)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/450f1580-aab0-422e-bef6-be47eb320588"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fft.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fft.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (77)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (75)
  • · No favicon or icon links detected
  • · 151 third-party resources (100% of weight)
  • · Certificate expires soon (13 days remaining)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (77)
  • · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
  • · 152 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback