Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 22:58 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
57.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

5 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 2

Certificate expires soon (21 days remaining)

Cert expiry within the renewal window — fix now while there's no user impact, instead of after expiry when there's a full outage.

Security › TLS & Certificates
Warning: 3

Cookie '2f4d6fdc46bcd694b9e7af987293628a' has no SameSite attribute

Without SameSite, cookies ride along on cross-site requests — enabling CSRF attacks that SameSite=Lax blocks for free.

Security › Cookie Security
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

External script from piwik.proxmox.com lacks integrity attribute

External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.

Security › Subresource Integrity
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your audience reach.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£206 investment → £3,279/month returns + GBP 18,050,000 risk avoided

Investment
£206
2.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
£3,279
£39,351/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18979% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 18,050,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£940.0 mo payback · +41875% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£131 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~14%.

Barriers
5
5 warn
Bounce delta
+14pp
added vs baseline
Score
85
A
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
1
  • Page loads in 2.7s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 206ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£206 2.8 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£131 4 fixes in ~105 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£2,977 / month at risk ~£35,718 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£18,050,000

UK GDPRPECREquality Act 2010
  • No privacy policy link detected
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    PECR: GBP 1,000 – GBP 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£2,976 /mo

+14.2pp bounce · ~1,417 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£0.12 /mo

1888.3 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~189 KB per page load
    Saves £0.12/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.41 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.71 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

5 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.73 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.71 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

605 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

892 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

923 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

892 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 87.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Joomla · 12 peers
You 84
·
Avg 74
+10 above average
0 50 100
Better than 91% of Joomla sites See full Joomla benchmark →
Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 84
·
Avg 74
+10 above average
0 50 100
Performance P97Content P95Sustainability P95Infrastructure P88Security P86Compliance P83Accessibility P75SEO P35

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 91 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

Joomla, on PHP

10 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Piwik PRO Core
CMS
Joomla
Framework
Bootstrap Font Awesome HSTS Open Graph Tailwind CSS jQuery metisMenu 1.4.0
Runtime
PHP

All Detected Technologies (10)

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Joomla is a free and open-source content management system for publishing web content.

Categories CMS Website https://www.joomla.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence robots.txt Disallow pattern: /administrator/, robots.txt Disallow pattern: /components/
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 3 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 10 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

metisMenu is a collapsible jQuery menu plugin.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/onokumus/metismenu Detected by BeaverCheck

Piwik PRO Core is a free alternative to Google Analytics that is privacy & compliance focused.

Categories Analytics Website https://piwik.pro Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fproxmox.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/467f3705-863b-4764-b766-0b8a6b2937d7)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/467f3705-863b-4764-b766-0b8a6b2937d7"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fproxmox.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fproxmox.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 3h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 2h → B (88)
  • · 5 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · Cookie '2f4d6fdc46bcd694b9e7af987293628a' has no SameSite attribute
  • · Certificate expires soon (21 days remaining)
  • · External script from piwik.proxmox.com lacks integrity attribute

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → B (89)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback