Skip to content
UA · UAH (₴) · Estimated Dev cost: ₴1,200/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-07-13 00:42 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
44.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 675ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (132ms), slowest from Singapore (1106ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
209ms
DNS 55ms · TLS 56ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
132ms
DNS 59ms · TLS 29ms
United Stated - New York
630ms
DNS 286ms · TLS 120ms
United States - Santa Clara
1009ms
DNS 494ms · TLS 182ms
Singapore - Singapore
1106ms
DNS 541ms · TLS 186ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
968ms
DNS 387ms · TLS 198ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 675ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page body has only 49 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 4

Page weighs 23.7 MB (22.8 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 4.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 4.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₴8,000 investment → ₴413,729/month returns

Investment
₴8,000
6.7 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₴413,729
₴4,964,748/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+61959% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₴7,8000.0 mo payback · +63551% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₴800 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~24%.

Barriers
6
1 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+24pp
added vs baseline
Score
75
B
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 344ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₴8,000 6.7 developer hours at ₴1200/hr
Quick wins
₴800 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₴272,929 / month at risk ~₴3,275,144 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₴272,689 /mo

+24.3pp bounce · ~2,433 lost visitors/mo

CPC: UAH 112.08

Bandwidth Waste

₴240 /mo

71853.0 MB/mo × 3.333 UAH/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~7.2 MB per page load
    Saves ₴240/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

65
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
78
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.17 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.49 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

344 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.021

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

12.49 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

18.34 s

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
82
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

659 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.33 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

10 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.011

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.43 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.97 s

Categories

8
Avg score 77.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3877 peers
You 78
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Accessibility P94Content P94Infrastructure P7Security P83Sustainability P18SEO P29Performance P70

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 82% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
Google Workspace · 1781 peers
You 78
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Accessibility P96Infrastructure P5Content P95Sustainability P14Security P83SEO P33Performance P67

Top 10% of Google Workspace sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 81% of Google Workspace sites See full Google Workspace benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, with Nginx CDN

7 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Open Graph
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (7)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=KWbx-R-dhcXMzy8g55Q-FLoxSZG6kK4Dn7ngVSYAigI
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: SMTP.GOOGLE.COM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XR5M014Y61

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechforce.in.ua)](https://beavercheck.com/results/46b4865e-7d68-42be-b322-22cdb5a3841e)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/46b4865e-7d68-42be-b322-22cdb5a3841e"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechforce.in.ua" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechforce.in.ua

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (84)
  • · Page weighs 23.7 MB (22.8 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Page body has only 49 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (88)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback