Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 852ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (552ms), slowest from Singapore (1460ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control header is missing. 6 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page body has only 71 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
BRL 1,290 investment → BRL 26,190/month returns + BRL 50,000,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~16%.
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 392ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Thin contentUnder 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first→ Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section
- Content is hard to readGraduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages→ Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
BRL 50,000,000
- No privacy policy link detectedLGPD: BRL 10,000 – BRL 50,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundLGPD: BRL 10,000 – BRL 50,000,000
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundLGPD: BRL 10,000 – BRL 50,000,000
- Privacy Policy not detectedLGPD: BRL 10,000 – BRL 50,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
BRL 26,188 /mo
+16.1pp bounce · ~1,611 lost visitors/mo
CPC: BRL 16.26
Bandwidth Waste
BRL 1.45 /mo
3542.3 MB/mo × 0.410 BRL/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~354 KB per page loadSaves BRL 1.45/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.94 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.27 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
392 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.036
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.60 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.26 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
715 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.10 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.099
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.18 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.11 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
No <main> landmark found
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Cloudflare Rocket Loader, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
Facebook Pixel 
Cloudflare Rocket Loader 
Google Font API Google Search Console HSTS 
HTTP/3 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints 
Tailwind CSS 
shadcn/ui Cloudflare All Detected Technologies (11)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Cloudflare Rocket Loader is responsible for prioritising over website's content by delaying the loading of Javascript until rendering.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
shadcn/ui is a component system built with Radix UI and Tailwind CSS.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Cloudflare Rocket Loader) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/49cad4f9-f9a9-4d12-b7d3-cc05f22cd5fa)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/49cad4f9-f9a9-4d12-b7d3-cc05f22cd5fa"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvipoftalmologia.com.br" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvipoftalmologia.com.brExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (91)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · No <main> landmark found
- · Page body has only 71 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder
- · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found