Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 11:09 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
35.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 251ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (46ms), slowest from Singapore (434ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control header is missing.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
139ms
DNS 41ms · TLS 23ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
46ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 11ms
United Stated - New York
191ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 10ms
United States - Santa Clara
330ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 11ms
Singapore - Singapore
434ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 8ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
365ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 251ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

5

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Page body has only 13 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 4

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 5

17 third-party resources (42% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 5.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$142 investment → $10,989/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$142
1.4 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$10,989
$131,873/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+92987% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$920.0 mo payback · +143761% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+26pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 5.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$142 1.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$142 4 fixes in ~85 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$20,115 / month at risk ~$241,381 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No headings found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,990 /mo

+26.0pp bounce · ~2,598 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.17 /mo

2113.3 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~211 KB per page load
    Saves $0.17/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

68
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.39 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.31 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

112 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.55 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.39 s

Desktop

91
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.07 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.62 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

10 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.25 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.62 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cloudflare Rocket Loader · 66 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 92% of Cloudflare Rocket Loader sites See full Cloudflare Rocket Loader benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 1402 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Accessibility P98Sustainability P94Performance P93Security P84Infrastructure P36Content P36SEO P37

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

Cloudflare Rocket Loader, on LiteSpeed, with Cloudflare CDN

8 technologies detected 4 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Hostinger
Framework
Cloudflare Rocket Loader HTTP/3 Tailwind CSS Vite shadcn/ui
Server
LiteSpeed
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (8)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.

Categories Web servers Website https://litespeedtech.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Cloudflare Rocket Loader is responsible for prioritising over website's content by delaying the loading of Javascript until rendering.

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://tailwindcss.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Vite is a rapid development tool for modern web projects.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://vitejs.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

shadcn/ui is a component system built with Radix UI and Tailwind CSS.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://ui.shadcn.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Hostinger is an employee-owned Web hosting provider and internet domain registrar.

Categories Hosting Website https://www.hostinger.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Cloudflare Rocket Loader) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FBtours.Hammer3.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/4acd1f19-5756-423e-bbc5-629d0c4d644c)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/4acd1f19-5756-423e-bbc5-629d0c4d644c"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FBtours.Hammer3.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FBtours.Hammer3.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 1h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+9

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

5 findings 1h → A (91)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Page body has only 13 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 17 third-party resources (42% of weight)

Send Feedback