Skip to content
CA · CAD (CA$) · Estimated Applicable regulations: PIPEDA · ACA Dev cost: CA$ 95/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 22:16 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
45.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 4

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 5

129 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 22.4s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 22.4s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CAD 1,013 investment → CAD 8,116/month returns + CAD 350,000 risk avoided

Investment
CAD 1,013
10.7 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
CAD 8,116
CAD 97,395/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+9511% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CAD 350,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CAD 5860.1 mo payback · +16525% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CAD 63 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 22.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 19.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.5s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CA$1,013 10.7 developer hours at CA$95/hr
Quick wins
CA$63 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CA$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CAD 8,116 / month at risk ~CAD 97,395 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CAD 350,000

ACAPIPEDA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    PIPEDA: CAD 1,000 – CAD 100,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    PIPEDA: CAD 1,000 – CAD 100,000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    PIPEDA: CAD 1,000 – CAD 100,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CAD 8,115 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CAD 2.80

Bandwidth Waste

CAD 1.14 /mo

10530.0 MB/mo × 0.108 CAD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.1 MB per page load
    Saves CAD 1.14/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

31
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

7.16 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

22.38 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.51 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.005

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.36 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

22.64 s

Desktop

84
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

925 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.43 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

137 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.087

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.92 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.24 s

Categories

8
Avg score 74.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cloudflare Bot Management · 475 peers
You 74
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Content P5Security P95Accessibility P8Compliance P14Infrastructure P85Sustainability P24Performance P28SEO P36

Top 10% of Cloudflare Bot Management sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 43% of Cloudflare Bot Management sites See full Cloudflare Bot Management benchmark →
Facebook · 1422 peers
You 74
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Security P97Infrastructure P94Content P7Accessibility P15Compliance P16SEO P22Sustainability P65Performance P45

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 58% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →

Technology stack

Cloudflare Bot Management, with Cloudflare CDN

9 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Cloudflare Bot Management Facebook Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS HTTP/3 Microsoft Tailwind CSS
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (9)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Cloudflare bot management solution identifies and mitigates automated traffic to protect websites from bad bots.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/products/bot-management/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=epr2y2df2pztizzuw9d92ycpewlrhq
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=3-L2X_Oas6Tvf9Rowx8ag5WYjVMRcQt2zQy2Y26k3js
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms69442585
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 16 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Cloudflare Bot Management) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmacleans.ca)](https://beavercheck.com/results/4aea4965-dbfe-486c-9a0d-e8fdd3645dc9)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/4aea4965-dbfe-486c-9a0d-e8fdd3645dc9"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmacleans.ca" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmacleans.ca

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 11h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · No favicon or icon links detected

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 10h → B (83)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 129 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback