Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 00:00 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
3.5m
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Performance, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

10 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€701 investment → €6,528/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€701
8.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€6.528
€78.341/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11072% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5310.1 mo payback · +14646% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€64 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
7
3 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
58
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 17.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 14.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.7s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 57 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€701 8.3 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€64 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.528 / month at risk ~€78.341 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.528 /mo

+29.7pp bounce · ~2,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,65 /mo

8781.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~878 KB per page load
    Saves €0,65/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

30
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

6.73 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

17.41 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.71 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.021

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.47 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

19.46 s

Desktop

57
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.86 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.01 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

229 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.10 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.44 s

Categories

8
Avg score 71.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Webflow · 52 peers
You 70
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Adobe Client Data Layer · 91 peers
You 70
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 14% of Adobe Client Data Layer sites See full Adobe Client Data Layer benchmark →

Technology stack

Webflow

13 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Adobe Experience Platform Launch Naver Analytics
CMS
Webflow
Framework
Adobe Client Data Layer 2.0.2Apple Google Font API Google Search Console Handlebars Microsoft 365 OneTrust Proofpoint Tailwind CSS VideoJS 8.23.7

All Detected Technologies (13)

Webflow is Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) for website building and hosting.

Categories Page builders Website https://webflow.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Client Data Layer is a framework of JavaScript objects on your site that contains all variable values used in your implementation.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://github.com/adobe/adobe-client-data-layer Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=MpAUn18J1ebpa2Wm

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=aVOSmh5Dsd1VpzYMM3a_ZvOQcjP9G5GDlvU-atf48ss

Handlebars is a JavaScript library used to create reusable webpage templates.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://handlebarsjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes spf.protection.outlook.com: v=spf1 ip4:137.71.173.56 ip4:137.71.173.58 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-00128a01.pphosted.com -all

OneTrust is a cloud-based data privacy management compliance platform.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.onetrust.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains cdn.cookielaw.org: https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSDKStub.js
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: mxa-00128a01.gslb.pphosted.com
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 13 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Video.js is a JavaScript and CSS library that makes it easier to work with and build on HTML5 video.

Categories Video players Website https://videojs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.

Categories Tag managers Website https://docs.adobelaunch.com/getting-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Naver Analytics is a Korean based analytics service.

Categories Analytics Website https://analytics.naver.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Adobe Client Data Layer) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fanalog.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/analog.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/analog.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fanalog.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fanalog.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected C (79)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (74)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 10 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → C (79)
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback