Skip to content
https://triplinkintl.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-04-16 17:05 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

SGD 623 investment → SGD 19,461/month returns + SGD 1,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
SGD 623
6.9 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
SGD 19,461
SGD 233,531/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+37415% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided SGD 1,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
SGD 5630.0 mo payback · +41417% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
SGD 83 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+26pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
1
  • Page takes 10.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 233ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

S$623 6.9 developer hours at S$90/hr
Quick wins
S$83 3 fixes in ~55 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

S$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

SGD 12,290 / month at risk ~SGD 147,484 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

SGD 1,000,000

PDPA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    PDPA: SGD 10,000 – SGD 1,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    PDPA: SGD 10,000 – SGD 1,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    PDPA: SGD 10,000 – SGD 1,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

SGD 12,290 /mo

+26.0pp bounce · ~2,598 lost visitors/mo

CPC: SGD 4.73

Bandwidth Waste

SGD 0.27 /mo

2499.4 MB/mo × 0.108 SGD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~250 KB per page load
    Saves SGD 0.27/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

52
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.77 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.00 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

233 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.155

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.61 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.03 s

Desktop

71
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.84 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.99 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.005

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.50 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.99 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Microsoft · 2447 peers
You 76
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P2Content P98Performance P89SEO P84Accessibility P38Sustainability P62Security P40Compliance P41

Top 10% of Microsoft sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 77% of Microsoft sites See full Microsoft benchmark →
Open Graph · 3471 peers
You 76
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P2Content P96Performance P82SEO P76Accessibility P33Compliance P35Security P44Sustainability P54

Top 10% of Open Graph sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 63% of Open Graph sites See full Open Graph benchmark →

Technology stack

Microsoft, hosted on Next.js

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Microsoft Open Graph PWA React Webpack
Hosting
Next.js 6.14.4

All Detected Technologies (6)

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://ak-s-cw.tripcdn.com/ares/NFES/100031248/1762236779672/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms59962970

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web apps built and enhanced with modern APIs to deliver enhanced capabilities, reliability, and installability while reaching anyone, anywhere, on any device, all with a single codebase.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://web.dev/progressive-web-apps/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Microsoft) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Next.js version may be outdated

Detected Next.js 6.14.4. The current major version is 14. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftriplinkintl.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/4e01ae50-c398-4853-a696-b222948f8ba5)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/4e01ae50-c398-4853-a696-b222948f8ba5"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftriplinkintl.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftriplinkintl.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (85)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (81)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (85)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback