Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 21:11 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.7m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

9 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 4

109 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 5

52 third-party resources (40% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 8.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 8.7s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€893 investment → €11,640/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€893
10.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€11.640
€139.680/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15550% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5530.0 mo payback · +25181% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€43 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
6
3 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
61
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 8.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 6.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.0s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 18 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€893 10.5 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€43 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.528 / month at risk ~€78.338 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • 5 of 8 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H3 (missing H2)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 1 image(s) with generic alt text
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.528 /mo

+29.7pp bounce · ~2,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,45 /mo

6101.3 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~610 KB per page load
    Saves €0,45/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

42
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.36 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.74 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.04 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.032

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.26 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

15.83 s

Desktop

70
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

822 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.51 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

85 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.95 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.51 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Sitecore · 26 peers
You 73
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 53% of Sitecore sites See full Sitecore benchmark →
Azure DNS · 93 peers
You 73
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 52% of Azure DNS sites See full Azure DNS benchmark →

Technology stack

Sitecore, on TypeScript, hosted on Azure, with Azure CDN CDN

26 technologies detected 6 stack layers 5 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Salesforce Interaction Studio Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
CMS
Sitecore
Framework
Azure DNS Azure Front Door Backbone.js 1.4.0 FullCalendar 3.8.1 GSAP 3.7.1HSTS Hammer.js 2.0.8 LazySizes MediaElement.js 4.2.16 Microsoft ASP.NET Modernizr 3.11.0 Moment.js 2.27.0 Open Graph ScrollMagic 2.0.8 ShareThis Tailwind CSS Underscore.js 4.17.21 jQuery 3.6.0
Runtime
TypeScript
CDN
Azure CDN
Hosting
Azure

All Detected Technologies (26)

Categories CDN Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-azure-ref: 20260422T210935Z-1749fb74d86s6d6ghC1SJC9p080000001ttg000000008g5u

Azure is a cloud computing service for building, testing, deploying, and managing applications and services through Microsoft-managed data centers.

Categories PaaS Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-azure-ref

TypeScript is an open-source language which builds on JavaScript by adding static type definitions.

Categories Programming languages Website https://www.typescriptlang.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Sitecore provides web content management, and multichannel marketing automation software.

Categories CMS Website https://www.sitecore.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns1-02.azure-dns.com

Azure Front Door is a scalable and secure entry point for fast delivery of your global web applications.

Categories Load balancers Website https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/ Detected by BeaverCheck

BackboneJS is a JavaScript library that allows to develop and structure the client side applications that run in a web browser.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://backbonejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

FullCalendar is a full-sized drag and drop JavaScript event calendar.

Categories Widgets Website https://fullcalendar.io Detected by BeaverCheck

GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://greensock.com/gsap Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Hammer.js is a JavaScript library for adding touch gestures like swipe, pinch, and rotate to web applications.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://hammerjs.github.io Detected by BeaverCheck

LazySizes is a JavaScript library used to delay the loading of images (iframes, scripts, etc) until they come into view.

Categories JavaScript libraries, Performance Website https://github.com/aFarkas/lazysizes Detected by BeaverCheck

MediaElement.js is a set of custom Flash plugins that mimic the HTML5 MediaElement API for browsers that don't support HTML5 or don't support the media codecs.

Categories Video players Website https://www.mediaelementjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://www.asp.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Modernizr is a JavaScript library that detects the features available in a user's browser.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://modernizr.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Moment.js is a free and open-source JavaScript library that removes the need to use the native JavaScript Date object directly.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://momentjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

ScrollMagic is a jQuery plugin which essentially lets you use the scrollbar like a playback scrub control.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://scrollmagic.io Detected by BeaverCheck

ShareThis provides free engagement and growth tools (e.g., share buttons, follow buttons, and reaction buttons) for site owners.

Categories Widgets Website https://sharethis.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 19 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-GNHKR21PZP&cx=c&gtm=4e64k0

Salesforce Interaction Studio (formerly Evergage) is a cloud-based software that allows users to collect, analyze, and respond to user behavior on their websites and web applications in real-time.

Categories Personalisation, Segmentation Website https://www.salesforce.com/products/marketing-cloud/customer-interaction Detected by BeaverCheck

Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (formerly known as Pardot) is an application specifically designed for B2B marketing automation.

Categories Marketing automation Website https://www.salesforce.com/products/marketing-cloud/marketing-automation Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Azure DNS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

26 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fglobal.fujitsu)](https://beavercheck.com/results/4ed07eff-6b34-4efc-bfff-da95b6f68bde)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/4ed07eff-6b34-4efc-bfff-da95b6f68bde"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fglobal.fujitsu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fglobal.fujitsu

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 10h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (75)
  • · 9 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 52 third-party resources (40% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 10h → B (81)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 109 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback