Skip to content
DE · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: DSGVO · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €90/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 00:00 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Performance, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 11.2 MB (4.6 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 11.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 11.8s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€653 investment → €9,210/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€653
7.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€9.210
€110.525/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+16839% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5630.1 mo payback · +19549% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€23 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 11.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 9.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 21 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 588ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€653 7.3 developer hours at €90/hr
Quick wins
€23 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.377 / month at risk ~€76.527 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveDSGVOEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    DSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    DSGVO: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    DSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.376 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€1,08 /mo

14516.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page load
    Saves €1,08/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

52
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.40 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

11.81 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

588 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.012

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.08 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

17.11 s

Desktop

89
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

855 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.00 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

96 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

977 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.09 s

Categories

8
Avg score 74.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bulma · 369 peers
You 70
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Security P9Performance P11Accessibility P13Content P13Compliance P76Infrastructure P57Sustainability P47SEO P52

Top 10% of Bulma sites score 75+ on Security; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 6% of Bulma sites See full Bulma benchmark →
core-js · 1582 peers
You 70
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Security P11Content P16Accessibility P21Performance P23Compliance P76Infrastructure P67SEO P62Sustainability P60

Top 10% of core-js sites score 75+ on Security; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 13% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Bulma

13 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Piano Analytics
Build
Piano
Framework
Bulma Facebook GSAP 1.15.1Google Search Console HTTP/3 Microsoft Open Graph RSS Swiper core-js 3.46.0 jQuery 2.1.4

All Detected Technologies (13)

Categories Framework Website https://bulma.io Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 30 Bulma class patterns in HTML
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=yx2i1wde5bpdp9idovtxbhgnkcy043

GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://greensock.com/gsap Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=xs1IinVJoRewss708NY5ChBw8hW4Can5iwsS9xpuZUo

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms78756071

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Piano Analytics is a data integration platform that consolidates marketing analytics, product analytics, content analytics, transaction data, and first-party data to offer a centralised source for reporting and segmentation.

Categories Analytics Website https://piano.io/product/analytics/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Piano is a enterprise SaaS company which specialising in advanced media business processes and ecommerce optimisation.

Categories Personalisation Website https://piano.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 2.1.4. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeutschlandfunk.de)](https://beavercheck.com/results/510ebe21-84f6-4d49-a8d0-f5f77674dc4a)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/510ebe21-84f6-4d49-a8d0-f5f77674dc4a"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeutschlandfunk.de" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeutschlandfunk.de

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (75)
  • · Page weighs 11.2 MB (4.6 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (80)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback