Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 4855ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (1054ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (11395ms). No CDN (document or assets). 6 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
golsaplus.ir fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.
No DMARC record found
Without DMARC, anyone can send phishing emails using your domain name.
No Permissions-Policy header
Permissions-Policy locks down browser APIs you don't use, shrinking the attack surface.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
IRR 13,125,000 investment → IRR 258,606,406/month returns
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.
- Page takes 5.1s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 2.6s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 12 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- Viewport disables user zoomVisitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk→ Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
- Thin contentUnder 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first→ Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Bounce-Rate Cost
IRR 130,485,617 /mo
+26.8pp bounce · ~2,677 lost visitors/mo
CPC: IRR 48739.50
Bandwidth Waste
IRR 6,103 /mo
1815.6 MB/mo × 3361.345 IRR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~182 KB per page loadSaves IRR 6,103/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.84 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
5.06 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
108 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.092
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
45.42 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.11 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.73 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.12 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.048
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.29 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.12 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Accessibility
Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of HSTS sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 86 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
HSTS
Stack Architecture
Cart Functionality 
Lucide 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints 
Tailwind CSS 
shadcn/ui All Detected Technologies (7)
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
shadcn/ui is a component system built with Radix UI and Tailwind CSS.
Observations (1)
No build tool detected
A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/golsaplus.ir)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/golsaplus.ir"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgolsaplus.ir" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgolsaplus.irExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 9h total → projected A (91)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
- · No Permissions-Policy header
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
- · No DMARC record found
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source