Skip to content
RU · RUB (₽) · Estimated Dev cost: ₽3,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 20:07 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie '__ddg10_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie '__ddg1_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie '__ddg8_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

Cookie '__ddg9_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽14,000 investment → ₽306,635/month returns

Investment
₽14 000
4.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₽306 635
₽3 679 620/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+26183% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽12 2500.0 mo payback · +29938% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₽3 500 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
9
1 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
66
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 9.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 392ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽14,000 4.0 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽3,500 4 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽175 330 / month at risk ~₽2 103 966 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽175 288 /mo

+29.2pp bounce · ~2,921 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽42 /mo

5799.0 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~580 KB per page load
    Saves ₽42/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

40
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
64
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.19 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

9.67 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

392 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.231

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.09 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.79 s

Desktop

82
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
68
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.11 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.34 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

32 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.07 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.34 s

Categories

8
Avg score 72.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 71
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Infrastructure P10Security P14SEO P21Accessibility P25Performance P70Content P31Sustainability P51

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 65 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 18% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
DDoS-Guard · 9 peers
You 71
·
Avg 71
At average
0 50 100
Better than 33% of DDoS-Guard sites See full DDoS-Guard benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap

11 technologies detected 2 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Yandex.Metrika
Framework
Bootstrap DDoS-Guard Moment.js 2.30.1 Open Graph Popper Prototype Swiper Tippy.js jQuery 3.7.1 jQuery UI 1.12.1

All Detected Technologies (11)

Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 3 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML

DDoS-Guard is a Russian Internet infrastructure company which provides DDoS protection, content delivery network services, and web hosting services.

Categories Security Website https://ddos-guard.net Detected by BeaverCheck

Moment.js is a free and open-source JavaScript library that removes the need to use the native JavaScript Date object directly.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://momentjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Popper is a positioning engine, its purpose is to calculate the position of an element to make it possible to position it near a given reference element.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://popper.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Prototype is a JavaScript Framework that aims to ease development of web applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://www.prototypejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Tippy.js is the complete tooltip, popover, dropdown, and menu solution for the web, powered by Popper.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://atomiks.github.io/tippyjs Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://cbr.ru/common/libs/jquery-3.7.1.min.js?v=v735956814
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jqueryui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Yandex.Metrica is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://metrika.yandex.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcbr.ru)](https://beavercheck.com/results/525a12e9-2881-4476-8ed7-36133e4af563)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/525a12e9-2881-4476-8ed7-36133e4af563"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcbr.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcbr.ru

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected C (78)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → C (78)
  • · Cookie '__ddg10_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg1_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg8_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg9_' is missing the Secure flag

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → C (78)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback