Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Acceptable global latency — average 223ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (46ms), slowest from Singapore (427ms). Netlify in front.
Audit overview
All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
1High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
4High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Page weighs 10.0 MB (5.7 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
100 inline style attribute(s) detected
Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$1,800 investment → $6,546/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~24%.
- Page takes 20.0s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 17.5s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.1sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- 5 of 5 <nav> elements are unlabeledADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- Heading level skipped: H2 → H6 (missing H3)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- Heading level skipped: H2 → H5 (missing H3)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- Heading level skipped: H2 → H4 (missing H3)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- 1 heading(s) are over 120 characters -- likely a misformatted paragraphADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- 1 image(s) with filename as alt textADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- 1 image(s) with generic alt textADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$6,545 /mo
+24.3pp bounce · ~2,433 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$1.44 /mo
17961.3 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.8 MB per page loadSaves $1.44/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
10.43 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
19.95 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.11 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
10.52 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
20.02 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.68 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.32 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
47 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.36 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
4.29 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 10.0 MB (5.7 MB transferred)
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Sanity, hosted on Amazon Web Services, with Amazon S3 CDN
Stack Architecture
Linkedin Ads Linkedin Insight Tag 
Sanity Sanity.io 
Nuxt.js 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints Proofpoint Sentry 
Vue.js 
Wistia 
YouTube 
anime.js 
Amazon S3 
Netlify Netlify CDN 
Amazon Web Services All Detected Technologies (21)
Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.
Netlify providers hosting and server-less backend services for web applications and static websites.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.
Sanity is a platform for structured content. It comes with an open-source, headless CMS that can be customized with Javascript, a real-time hosted data store and an asset delivery pipeline.
Sanity is a platform for structured content. It comes with an open-source, headless CMS that can be customized with Javascript, a real-time hosted data store and an asset delivery pipeline.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Nuxt is a Vue framework for developing modern web applications.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.
Wistia is designed exclusively to serve companies using video on their websites for marketing, support, and sales.
YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.
Anime.js (/ˈæn.ə.meɪ/) is a lightweight JavaScript animation library with a simple, yet powerful API.It works with CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes and JavaScript Objects.
Linkedin Ads is a paid marketing tool that offers access to Linkedin social networks through various sponsored posts and other methods.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/53982931-d8bc-452d-8384-7d046f2480ec)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/53982931-d8bc-452d-8384-7d046f2480ec"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvantor.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvantor.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 18h total → projected A (90)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+2Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 10.0 MB (5.7 MB transferred)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
- · 100 inline style attribute(s) detected
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+2Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source