Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 628ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (130ms), slowest from Singapore (986ms). No CDN detected. 4 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
1High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
4High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
31 inline style attribute(s) detected
Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.
43 third-party resources (51% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$1,100 investment → $13,135/month returns + USD 7,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.
- Page takes 7.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 5.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No viewport meta tagMobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature→ Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 406ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$7,500
- No privacy policy link detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
Bounce-Rate Cost
$8,502 /mo
+31.6pp bounce · ~3,161 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$0.24 /mo
2965.2 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~297 KB per page loadSaves $0.24/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.30 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
7.69 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
406 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.18 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
7.71 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
552 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
859 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.048
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
571 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.20 s
Categories
6How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Google Workspace sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Google Search Console, hosted on Fly.io
Stack Architecture
React 
Webpack 
Fly.io 
Next.js All Detected Technologies (7)
Fly is a platform for running full stack apps and databases.
Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.
Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.
Observations (1)
No build tool detected
A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/5399209e-8bfd-43a6-b4ca-f70ec36bb3d3)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/5399209e-8bfd-43a6-b4ca-f70ec36bb3d3"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Faiseomate.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Faiseomate.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 11h total → projected B (88)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+2Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 43 third-party resources (51% of weight)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+6Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found
- · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
- · 31 inline style attribute(s) detected