Skip to content
RU · RUB (₽) · Estimated Dev cost: ₽3,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 23:12 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
2.9m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

5

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Cookie '7xkodguI' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 2

Cookie 'AmsJa8s2' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie 'McKa82ms' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie 'PHPSESS' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

Cookie 'Uas' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽4,375 investment → ₽267,238/month returns

Investment
₽4 375
1.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₽267 238
₽3 206 854/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+73200% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽2 6250.0 mo payback · +122066% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 5.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 5.9s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽4,375 1.3 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽4,375 5 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽175 360 / month at risk ~₽2 104 326 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽175 288 /mo

+29.2pp bounce · ~2,921 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽72 /mo

9925.8 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~993 KB per page load
    Saves ₽72/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

39
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
60
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.71 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.47 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

5.92 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

7.13 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

23.95 s

Desktop

58
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
70
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

885 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.49 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.04 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.35 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.84 s

Categories

8
Avg score 73.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cloudflare · 2102 peers
You 71
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Sustainability P7Accessibility P9Compliance P15Performance P17SEO P70Infrastructure P58Content P54Security P51

Top 10% of Cloudflare sites score 96+ on Sustainability; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 13% of Cloudflare sites See full Cloudflare benchmark →
core-js · 1582 peers
You 71
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P15Accessibility P16Infrastructure P78Sustainability P26Security P68Performance P33SEO P62Content P39

Top 10% of core-js sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 73 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 24% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Cloudflare

14 technologies detected 2 stack layers Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Yandex.Metrika
Framework
Cloudflare DDoS-Guard Facebook Google Search Console Google Tag Manager Google Workspace HSTS Microsoft Open Graph PWA Underscore.js 4.17.21 Vue.js core-js 3.28.0

All Detected Technologies (14)

Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: alla.ns.cloudflare.com

DDoS-Guard is a Russian Internet infrastructure company which provides DDoS protection, content delivery network services, and web hosting services.

Categories Security Website https://ddos-guard.net Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=6rpvsjo3a9v9zgvyu2djh9w24hk4q7
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=U10gGZhkN-GB66X3mYE1E2T9IFzVgqV4gh4g0KoONu8
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-GDRZR2E90Y
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes _spf.google.com: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.dashasender.ru include:_spf.yandex.net ~all

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=9F9058F28ABBA716DA65288227B00376C128C0E4

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web apps built and enhanced with modern APIs to deliver enhanced capabilities, reliability, and installability while reaching anyone, anywhere, on any device, all with a single codebase.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://web.dev/progressive-web-apps/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Yandex.Metrica is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://metrika.yandex.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Cloudflare) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpikabu.ru)](https://beavercheck.com/results/53a9dd71-1fc2-47ef-bde7-308cddc4eb33)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/53a9dd71-1fc2-47ef-bde7-308cddc4eb33"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpikabu.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpikabu.ru

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 1h total → projected C (79)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+8

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

5 findings 1h → C (79)
  • · Cookie '7xkodguI' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'AmsJa8s2' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'McKa82ms' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'PHPSESS' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'Uas' is missing the Secure flag

Send Feedback