Skip to content
Scanned
2026-10-24 13:38 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
44.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 381ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (108ms), slowest from Singapore (818ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control header is missing. 1 location above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
108ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 17ms
Spain - Madrid
396ms
DNS 37ms · TLS 31ms
Singapore - Singapore
818ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 174ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
359ms
DNS 19ms · TLS 20ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
434ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 14ms
United Stated - New York
173ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 16ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 381ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

competitorsbacklinksfree.website fails 3 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found, MTA-STS policy file present but DNS record missing. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$542 investment → $13,086/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$542
5.4 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$13,086
$157,033/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+28891% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$475 → 0.0 mo payback · +32960% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$92 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+26pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 9.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$542 5.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$92 3 fixes in ~55 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$7,062 / month at risk ~$84,739 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,061 /mo

+26.3pp bounce · ~2,625 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.31 /mo

3893.5 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~389 KB per page load
    Saves $0.31/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

59
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

6.55 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

9.55 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.019

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.55 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.55 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

781 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

821 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

781 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

821 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 80.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1470 peers
You 82
·
Avg 76
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Infrastructure P6Sustainability P90Performance P88Content P14Security P86Accessibility P82SEO P40

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 81% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 2350 peers
You 82
·
Avg 79
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Infrastructure P4Content P24Performance P74Sustainability P74Accessibility P70Security P65SEO P51

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 66% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, on PHP, with Cloudflare CDN

5 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Font API HTTP/3 YouTube
Runtime
PHP 8.5.3
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (5)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-powered-by: PHP/8.5.3
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.

Categories Video players Website https://www.youtube.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header

The X-Powered-By header reveals 'PHP 8.5.3'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcompetitorsbacklinksfree.website)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/competitorsbacklinksfree.website)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/competitorsbacklinksfree.website"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcompetitorsbacklinksfree.website" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcompetitorsbacklinksfree.website

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (87)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → A (90)
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback