Skip to content
Scanned
2026-07-01 06:44 UTC
Worker
🇸🇬 Singapore
Duration
1.6m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 513ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (163ms), slowest from Singapore (897ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Singapore - Singapore
Full audit
897ms
DNS 16ms · TLS 10ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
163ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 12ms
Spain - Madrid
220ms
DNS 41ms · TLS 23ms
United Stated - New York
347ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 8ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
782ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 9ms
United States - Santa Clara
669ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 10ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 513ms · Cache: s-maxage=31536000

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 3

9 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 5

10 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.

Performance › CSS Performance Depth
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 16.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 16.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$817 investment → $8,042/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$817
8.2 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$8,042
$96,510/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11718% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$8000.1 mo payback · +11964% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$67 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
3
  • Page takes 16.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 14.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.7s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$817 8.2 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$67 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,042 / month at risk ~$96,510 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,042 /mo

+29.9pp bounce · ~2,990 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.43 /mo

5371.6 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~537 KB per page load
    Saves $0.43/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

39
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.47 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

16.49 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.72 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.018

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.54 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

16.53 s

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

432 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

638 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

222 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.009

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.22 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.30 s

Categories

8
Avg score 82.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Prismic · 9 peers
You 83
·
Avg 73
+10 above average
0 50 100
Better than 88% of Prismic sites See full Prismic benchmark →
dc.js · 71 peers
You 83
·
Avg 74
+9 above average
0 50 100
Better than 95% of dc.js sites See full dc.js benchmark →

Technology stack

Prismic, on Emotion, hosted on Amazon Web Services, with Amazon S3 CDN

23 technologies detected 6 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
AB Tasty Leadfeeder Linkedin Insight Tag
CMS
Prismic
Framework
Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS MUI Material UI Material-UI Microsoft Open Graph Priority Hints React Tailwind CSS Webpack dc.js
Runtime
Emotion
CDN
Amazon S3 Cloudflare
Hosting
Amazon Web Services Heroku Next.js 15.5.18

All Detected Technologies (23)

Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.

Categories PaaS Website https://aws.amazon.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Hosting Website https://www.heroku.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Via header contains heroku

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://greenly.earth/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-42372ed130431b0a.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Emotion is a library designed for writing CSS styles with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Development Website https://emotion.sh Detected by BeaverCheck

Prismic is a headless CMS for Jamstack.

Categories CMS Website https://prismic.io Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=JahnncPu3j4vP6aMSABWxEpoJ6Uhl9nqsiavK6FxrGc
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

MUI(formerly Material UI) is a simple and customisable component library to build faster, beautiful, and more accessible React applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://mui.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Material UI is a simple and customisable component library to build faster, beautiful, and more accessible React applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://mui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://mui.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 22 MUI class names (e.g. MuiButton) in HTML
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=A6C811CBEF1D1F180BC7FB4A6297CCC681B2DFB1

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 104 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Chunk pattern: https://try.abtasty.com/shared/commons.32b0810ba1fc402d09de.js

A multi-dimensional charting library built to work natively with crossfilter and rendered using d3.js

Categories JavaScript graphics, JavaScript libraries Website https://dc-js.github.io/dc.js/ Detected by BeaverCheck

AB Tasty is a customer experience optimisation company. AB Tasty offers AI-driven experimentation, personalisation, and product optimisation platforms for user testing.

Categories A/B Testing Website https://www.abtasty.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Leadfeeder is a B2B visitor identification software that tracks and identifies companies that visit your website.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.leadfeeder.com Detected by BeaverCheck

LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.

Categories Analytics Website https://business.linkedin.com/marketing-solutions/insight-tag Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

23 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreenly.earth)](https://beavercheck.com/results/5466b20b-1efa-411c-9850-21a7550fd7af)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/5466b20b-1efa-411c-9850-21a7550fd7af"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreenly.earth" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreenly.earth

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 8h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (87)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 9 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · 10 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 2h → B (87)
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+3

Higher effort, long-term payoff

1 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Send Feedback