https://agilemanifesto.org Export & share

Scanned

2026-04-22 23:55 UTC

Worker

🇸🇬 Singapore

Duration

38.00s

Vs prev

—

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Impact

Quick Wins

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE

Desktop

Mobile

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding

What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. The 3 security gaps leave your users exposed — modern browsers increasingly warn visitors about insecure sites. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.

3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$692 investment → $8,502/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment

$692

6.9 h · 5 findings

Monthly returns

$8,502

$102,024/yr

Payback

0.1 mo

+14651% Y1

Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500

Or — fix only the top 3 findings

$625 → 0.1 mo payback · +16224% Y1

Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

$92 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.

Barriers

2 crit 6 warn

Bounce delta

+32pp

added vs baseline

Score

Speed

Trust

Usability

Content

Nav

No viewport meta tag
Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
→ Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
3 broken link(s) on the page
Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
No HSTS header
Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
No Content-Security-Policy header
Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
No Open Graph tags
Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$692 6.9 developer hours at $100/hr

Quick wins

$92 3 fixes in ~55 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

Custom rate

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,502 / month at risk ~$102,024 / year if left unfixed

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA

No privacy policy link detected
CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,502 /mo

+31.6pp bounce · ~3,161 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.02 /mo

207.6 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

Optimize transfer: save ~21 KB per page load
Saves $0.02/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Monthly visitors

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Conversion rate (%)

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Avg. order value

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue

Current bounce (est.)

After fixes (est.)

Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.55 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.55 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.55 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.55 s

Desktop

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

414 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

414 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

414 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

414 ms

Categories

Security P1Compliance P1Performance P99Content P5Sustainability P95Infrastructure P13SEO P16Accessibility P32

Top 10% of Varnish sites score 75+ on Security; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 51% of Varnish sites See full Varnish benchmark →

Fastly · 380 peers

You 74

Avg 74

At average

0 50 100

Security P1Compliance P1Performance P98Content P3Sustainability P94Infrastructure P9SEO P14Accessibility P27

Top 10% of Fastly sites score 76+ on Security; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 43% of Fastly sites See full Fastly benchmark →

Technology stack

Varnish, hosted on DigitalOcean, with Fastly CDN

5 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Analytics

Google Analytics

Framework

Varnish

CDN

Fastly

Hosting

DigitalOcean

GitHub Pages

All Detected Technologies (5)

Fastly is a cloud computing services provider. Fastly's cloud platform provides a content delivery network, Internet security services, load balancing, and video & streaming services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.fastly.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-served-by: cache-sin-wsat1880032-SIN

This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns2.digitalocean.com

GitHub Pages is a static site hosting service.

Categories PaaS Website https://pages.github.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-github-request-id

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck

This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google-analytics.com: //www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js

Observations (2)

Hosted on GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages provides free static hosting with automatic HTTPS. Limitations: no server-side code, 1GB site size limit, 100GB/month bandwidth.

No build tool detected

A framework (Varnish) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

Markdown

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fagilemanifesto.org)](https://beavercheck.com/results/54979ad5-6e49-4735-a14d-2370c74112e7)

HTML

<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/54979ad5-6e49-4735-a14d-2370c74112e7"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fagilemanifesto.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>

Image URL

https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fagilemanifesto.org

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (79)

· No <main> landmark found
· HSTS header is missing
· No favicon or icon links detected

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (83)

· Content-Security-Policy header is missing
· No Content-Security-Policy header found