Skip to content
IT · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €55/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-07-12 08:00 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
45.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 450ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (52ms), slowest from Singapore (763ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
140ms
DNS 48ms · TLS 32ms
United Stated - New York
417ms
DNS 204ms · TLS 73ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
52ms
DNS 44ms · TLS 5ms
United States - Santa Clara
732ms
DNS 323ms · TLS 138ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
598ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 197ms
Singapore - Singapore
763ms
DNS 319ms · TLS 152ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 450ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 9.8 MB (7.5 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

7 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 26.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 26.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€385 investment → €6,771/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€385
7.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€6.771
€81.254/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+21005% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€3580.1 mo payback · +22628% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€55 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
10
2 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
56
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
3
  • Page takes 26.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 24.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.4s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€385 7.0 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€55 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.771 / month at risk ~€81.254 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 2 empty heading(s)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.769 /mo

+30.8pp bounce · ~3,077 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€1,74 /mo

23457.2 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.3 MB per page load
    Saves €1,74/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

31
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
94
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

9.06 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

26.92 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.39 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.004

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.06 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

28.27 s

Desktop

72
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
75
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.06 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.68 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

67 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.010

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.50 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.92 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Adobe Experience Manager · 167 peers
You 80
·
Avg 72
+8 above average
0 50 100
Better than 96% of Adobe Experience Manager sites See full Adobe Experience Manager benchmark →
Bootstrap · 909 peers
You 80
·
Avg 74
+6 above average
0 50 100
Security P94Accessibility P94Compliance P18Sustainability P21SEO P73Content P35Performance P53Infrastructure P50

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 88% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

Adobe Experience Manager, on Java

17 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Adobe Analytics Adobe Experience Platform Launch Dynatrace Dynatrace RUM
CMS
Adobe Experience Manager
Framework
Bootstrap 4.6.2Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft Microsoft 365 Open Graph ServiceNow Swiper Underscore.js 4.17.21 Vue.js 2.6.12 jQuery 3.6.0
Runtime
Java

All Detected Technologies (17)

Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.

Categories Programming languages Website https://java.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.

Categories CMS Website https://www.adobe.com/marketing/experience-manager.html Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 9 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=zD2EJ2sAg05lpdG9PgLs6Lgk7dxNdE2WuUQEfTVaD1g

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms60012551
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: servizioelettriconazionale-it.mail.protection.outlook.com

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

ServiceNow is a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.servicenow.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://servizioelettriconazionale.it/etc.clientlibs/servizio-elettrico-nazionale/clientlibs/porting/clientlib-jquery.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Analytics is a web analytics, marketing and cross-channel analytics application.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.adobe.com/analytics/adobe-analytics.html Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.

Categories Tag managers Website https://docs.adobelaunch.com/getting-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Dynatrace is a technology company that produces a software intelligence platform based on artificial intelligence to monitor and optimise application performance and development, IT infrastructure, and user experience for businesses and government agencies throughout the world.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.dynatrace.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Dynatrace RUM is an AI powered, full stack, automated real user monitoring platform built by Dynatrace.

Categories RUM Website https://www.dynatrace.com/platform/real-user-monitoring Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (5)

jQuery loaded alongside a modern framework

Both jQuery and Vue.js are loaded. Modern frameworks handle DOM manipulation natively. jQuery may be unnecessary and adds ~30KB to the page weight. Check the Performance tab for bundle analysis.

→ Performance

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Bootstrap version may be outdated

Detected Bootstrap 4.6.2. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Vue.js version may be outdated

Detected Vue.js 2.6.12. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservizioelettriconazionale.it)](https://beavercheck.com/results/550d9ae0-ffb8-489d-90eb-cb3a9dbe07a6)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/550d9ae0-ffb8-489d-90eb-cb3a9dbe07a6"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservizioelettriconazionale.it" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservizioelettriconazionale.it

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · Page weighs 9.8 MB (7.5 MB transferred)
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 7 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (91)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback