Audit overview
Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
1 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
10 image-in-link without alt text
Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.
10 image-only link(s) without alt text
Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
AUD 880 investment → AUD 10,543/month returns + AUD 50,200,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.
- Page takes 19.9s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 17.4s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Severe layout shift during page loadUsers mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration→ Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 504ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 1 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
AUD 50,200,000
- No privacy policy link detectedPrivacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
- 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedPrivacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundPrivacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
AUD 10,541 /mo
+30.1pp bounce · ~3,012 lost visitors/mo
CPC: AUD 3.50
Bandwidth Waste
AUD 1.46 /mo
11849.7 MB/mo × 0.123 AUD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.2 MB per page loadSaves AUD 1.46/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
6.91 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
19.91 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
504 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.736
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
15.88 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
20.28 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.67 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
6.05 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
26 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.541
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.53 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.12 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Apple sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 49 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Drupal, on PHP, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Linkedin Insight Tag 
Twitter Ads 
Drupal 
Bootstrap 
Font Awesome 6.5.2Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft 365 
OneTrust 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints 
Tailwind CSS 
Webpack 
jQuery 4.0.0
PHP 
Cloudflare 
Nginx 
cdnjs All Detected Technologies (21)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.
cdnjs is a free distributed JS library delivery service.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
Drupal is a free and open-source web content management framework.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
OneTrust is a cloud-based data privacy management compliance platform.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Twitter Ads is an advertising platform for Twitter 'microblogging' system.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/anu.edu.au)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/anu.edu.au"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fanu.edu.au" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fanu.edu.auExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected C (79)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 10 image-in-link without alt text
- · 10 image-only link(s) without alt text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+6Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 control(s) without accessible label
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found