Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-30 12:45 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.3m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 995ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (344ms), slowest from New York (1400ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control header is missing. 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
1159ms
DNS 39ms · TLS 26ms
United States - Santa Clara
344ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 13ms
United Stated - New York
1400ms
DNS 25ms · TLS 12ms
Singapore - Singapore
1115ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 46ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
1098ms
DNS 17ms · TLS 19ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
855ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 995ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

t7mel.co fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 3

1 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: WordPress 7.1.2

Each disclosed version enables direct CVE lookup -- attacker reads the version, searches the CVE database, targets the site with a tested exploit.

Security › HTML Version Disclosure
Warning: 4

2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 5

32 third-party resources (84% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your page blocks user input for 508ms — visitors may think the site is frozen. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 performance issues — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$550 investment → $4,129/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$550
5.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$4,129
$49,545/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+8908% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$350 → 0.1 mo payback · +14056% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$50 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~15%.

Barriers
5
1 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+15pp
added vs baseline
Score
78
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
1
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 508ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$550 5.5 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$50 2 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$4,129 / month at risk ~$49,545 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$4,129 /mo

+15.3pp bounce · ~1,535 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.12 /mo

1520.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~152 KB per page load
    Saves $0.12/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

72
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.10 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.75 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

508 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.264

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.39 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.94 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

547 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

885 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

26 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

806 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.43 s

Categories

8
Avg score 86.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WordPress · 1050 peers
You 85
·
Avg 76
+9 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P89Performance P82Content P81Sustainability P80SEO P78Security P72Infrastructure P49Compliance P50

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 97+ on Infrastructure; you're at 89 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 92% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 2227 peers
You 85
·
Avg 79
+6 above average
0 50 100
Content P80SEO P77Accessibility P76Performance P64Sustainability P64Security P58Infrastructure P43Compliance P57

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 89 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 78% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress 7.1.2, on LiteSpeed/PHP, with Cloudflare CDN

11 technologies detected 6 stack layers 5 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Litespeed Cache Yoast SEO
CMS
WordPress 7.1.2
Framework
HTTP/3 MySQL Open Graph Priority Hints RSS
Runtime
PHP
Server
LiteSpeed
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (11)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.

Categories Web servers Website https://litespeedtech.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header link contains wp-json
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

LiteSpeed Cache is an all-in-one site acceleration plugin for WordPress.

Categories Caching, WordPress plugins Website https://wordpress.org/plugins/litespeed-cache/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Yoast SEO is a search engine optimisation plugin for WordPress and other platforms.

Categories SEO, WordPress plugins Website https://yoast.com/wordpress/plugins/seo/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (HTTP/3) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.t7mel.co)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/t7mel.co)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/t7mel.co"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.t7mel.co" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.t7mel.co

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → A (90)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 32 third-party resources (84% of weight)
  • · 1 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: WordPress 7.1.2

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 5h → A (92)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · 2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback