Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
100
TTFB stable →
156ms
FCP stable →
1.0s
LCP stable →
1.0s
Scanned
2026-05-05 19:10 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
57.00s
Vs prev
Improved by +7

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 618ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (128ms), slowest from Singapore (1165ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
814ms
DNS 308ms · TLS 166ms
Spain - Madrid
128ms
DNS 43ms · TLS 27ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
129ms
DNS 52ms · TLS 25ms
United Stated - New York
441ms
DNS 175ms · TLS 86ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1030ms
DNS 411ms · TLS 206ms
Singapore - Singapore
1165ms
DNS 386ms · TLS 258ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 618ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Warning: 1

Page weight 1.6 MB exceeds 1 MB target by 611 KB

Page weight over the 1 MB target — image optimization is usually the biggest single lever.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 2

Unattributable: 350ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 3

https://mymoonova.com/: 485ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Critical: 4

Domain expires in 14 days

Domain expiry approaching — renew immediately and ensure auto-renew + alerting are configured.

Infrastructure › Domain Intelligence
Warning: 5

1 link(s) open in new tab without warning

Links with target="_blank" without rel="noopener" leak the originating page's window context — security and UX issue.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your server takes 814ms to respond — every other performance metric inherits that delay. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your conversion rate.
3 performance issues — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.
1 infrastructure issue creates a performance ceiling no frontend fix can overcome.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€400 investment → €361/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€400
5.0 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
€361
€4,332/yr
Payback
1.1 mo
+983% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€4001.1 mo payback · +983% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€80 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

1 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~2%.

Barriers
1
1 warn
Bounce delta
+2pp
added vs baseline
Score
97
A+
Speed
0
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
1
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€400 5.0 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€80 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€42,028 / month at risk ~€504,332 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500,000

EAA
  • 2 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€361 /mo

+1.6pp bounce · ~164 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0.37 /mo

5021.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~502 KB per page load
    Saves €0.37/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.07 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.07 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

48 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.07 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.25 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

273 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

290 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

853 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

292 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 87.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3770 peers
You 87
·
Avg 73
+14 above average
0 50 100
Security P98Compliance P98Performance P95Content P94SEO P82Infrastructure P27Sustainability P72Accessibility P70

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 2430 peers
You 87
·
Avg 75
+12 above average
0 50 100
Security P97Compliance P97Content P94Performance P91SEO P82Infrastructure P23Sustainability P67Accessibility P63

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console

3 technologies detected 1 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS Open Graph

All Detected Technologies (3)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=HPZwhfgUFzTBUml-6oj_bE-NJCJcrphdGt2j8CAZ770

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/59450971-f213-47de-a08a-864a0bb4b8c2)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/59450971-f213-47de-a08a-864a0bb4b8c2"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → A (91)
  • · Domain expires in 14 days
  • · Unattributable: 350ms CPU time
  • · https://mymoonova.com/: 485ms CPU time
  • · 1 link(s) open in new tab without warning

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 4h → A (91)
  • · Page weight 1.6 MB exceeds 1 MB target by 611 KB

Send Feedback