Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 23:02 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.8m
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Performance, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 5

2 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$775 investment → $9,168/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$775
7.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$9,168
$110,022/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+14096% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.1 mo payback · +17503% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

11 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.

Barriers
11
2 crit 9 warn
Bounce delta
+34pp
added vs baseline
Score
53
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 17.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 15.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 964ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$775 7.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$9,168 / month at risk ~$110,022 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$9,168 /mo

+34.1pp bounce · ~3,408 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.98 /mo

12220.1 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.2 MB per page load
    Saves $0.98/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

35
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.24 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

17.79 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

964 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.148

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.78 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

20.68 s

Desktop

87
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.10 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.08 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.27 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.08 s

Categories

8
Avg score 73.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Drupal · 364 peers
You 72
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Content P10Performance P11Sustainability P12Compliance P82Security P33SEO P67Infrastructure P39Accessibility P48

Top 10% of Drupal sites score 92+ on Content; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 22% of Drupal sites See full Drupal benchmark →
Apple · 1267 peers
You 72
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Content P5Performance P18Sustainability P18SEO P79Security P22Compliance P77Infrastructure P41Accessibility P56

Top 10% of Apple sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 32% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →

Technology stack

Drupal 11, on PHP, with Cloudflare CDN

20 technologies detected 5 stack layers 6 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
AB Tasty Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
CMS
Drupal 11
Framework
Apple FingerprintJS Google Font API Google Search Console Highcharts 4.2.3 MediaElement.js 4.2.5Microsoft Microsoft 365 OneTrust Varnish VideoJS 5.11.6 YouTube jQuery 4.0.0
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Cloudflare Nginx

All Detected Technologies (20)

Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Drupal is a free and open-source web content management framework.

Categories CMS Website https://www.drupal.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence robots.txt Disallow pattern: /core/, robots.txt Disallow pattern: /modules/, robots.txt Disallow pattern: /profiles/
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=KXumtuiSfafUEAY4_2Kyw9QfDKHF-oI9BRNQm-DLezA

FingerprintJS is a browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them.

Categories JavaScript libraries, Browser fingerprinting Website https://fingerprintjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=TgVQmgjkMbtRJlLIf0wqSvOa4uv2YLvgWA8hJlbk5JQ

Highcharts is a charting library written in pure JavaScript, for adding interactive charts to a website or web application. Highcharts meets accessibility standards and works with Python, Angular, React, iOS, Android, and more.

Categories JavaScript graphics Website https://www.highcharts.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

MediaElement.js is a set of custom Flash plugins that mimic the HTML5 MediaElement API for browsers that don't support HTML5 or don't support the media codecs.

Categories Video players Website https://www.mediaelementjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms45708025
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: habitat-org.mail.protection.outlook.com

OneTrust is a cloud-based data privacy management compliance platform.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.onetrust.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains cdn.cookielaw.org: https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSDKStub.js?did=01914cf4-abc9-7da0-9abe-f54c823a380f-test

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Video.js is a JavaScript and CSS library that makes it easier to work with and build on HTML5 video.

Categories Video players Website https://videojs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.

Categories Video players Website https://www.youtube.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AB Tasty is a customer experience optimisation company. AB Tasty offers AI-driven experimentation, personalisation, and product optimisation platforms for user testing.

Categories A/B Testing Website https://www.abtasty.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google-analytics.com: https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-VD37XK5DBV&cx=c&gtm=4e64k1

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

20 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhabitat.org)](https://beavercheck.com/results/59834e5a-0d42-46fe-b012-ff44e2515a55)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/59834e5a-0d42-46fe-b012-ff44e2515a55"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhabitat.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhabitat.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (76)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 2 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (81)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback