Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Acceptable global latency — average 463ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (110ms), slowest from Singapore (887ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
tdsolarenergy.com fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
Page weighs 9.9 MB (9.5 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€199 investment → €4,665/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~24%.
- Page takes 14.5s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 12.0s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- Content is hard to readGraduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages→ Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
- 2 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€500.000
- No <main> landmark foundEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- 1 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeledEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€4.662 /mo
+23.8pp bounce · ~2,375 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 1.96
Bandwidth Waste
€2,21 /mo
29815.2 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~3.0 MB per page loadSaves €2,21/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.90 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
14.46 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
149 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.002
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
7.32 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
14.46 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
587 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.67 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.57 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.67 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 9.9 MB (9.5 MB transferred)
Security
HSTS header is missing
Accessibility
No <main> landmark found
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 83 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Google Font API, on LiteSpeed, with jsDelivr CDN
Stack Architecture
Hostinger 
Google Font API 
Google Maps 
HTTP/3 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints 
Tailwind CSS 
LiteSpeed 
jsDelivr All Detected Technologies (9)
JSDelivr is a free public CDN for open-source projects. It can serve web files directly from the npm registry and GitHub repositories without any configuration.
LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
Google Maps is a web mapping service. It offers satellite imagery, aerial photography, street maps, 360° interactive panoramic views of streets, real-time traffic conditions, and route planning for traveling by foot, car, bicycle and air, or public transportation.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Hostinger is an employee-owned Web hosting provider and internet domain registrar.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/tdsolarenergy.com)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/tdsolarenergy.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftdsolarenergy.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftdsolarenergy.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 4h total → projected A (90)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+7Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 9.9 MB (9.5 MB transferred)
- · No <main> landmark found
- · HSTS header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
- · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer