Skip to content
https://beboplondon.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-10-13 16:55 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 425ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (162ms), slowest from Singapore (659ms). Document on AWS CloudFront; assets also on Fastly. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
571ms
DNS 81ms · TLS 8ms
Spain - Madrid
162ms
DNS 50ms · TLS 6ms
Singapore - Singapore
659ms
DNS 115ms · TLS 5ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
220ms
DNS 155ms · TLS 14ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
655ms
DNS 56ms · TLS 12ms
United Stated - New York
284ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 7ms
CDN: AWS CloudFront (RefreshHit from cloudfront) · document + assets · Avg TTFB: 425ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

beboplondon.com fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

Page weighs 7.7 MB (5.9 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 5

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 5.8s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$358 investment → $7,371/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$358
3.6 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$7,371
$88,450/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+24584% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$342 → 0.0 mo payback · +25788% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$58 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.

Barriers
6
2 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+26pp
added vs baseline
Score
68
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 5.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 585ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$358 3.6 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$58 3 fixes in ~35 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$3,016 / month at risk ~$36,189 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$3,014 /mo

+26.0pp bounce · ~2,598 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 1.16

Bandwidth Waste

$1.49 /mo

18603.5 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.9 MB per page load
    Saves $1.49/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

52
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
94
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.01 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.78 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

585 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.64 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.81 s

Desktop

83
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
94
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.25 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.46 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

191 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.99 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.43 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Amazon Route 53 · 1053 peers
You 80
·
Avg 73
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Accessibility P96Security P93Performance P80Content P71Infrastructure P66Sustainability P45SEO P47

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 92% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →
Bootstrap · 1096 peers
You 80
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P85Accessibility P84Sustainability P23Content P76SEO P32Performance P60Infrastructure P58

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 78% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon Route 53, on styled-components, hosted on AWS, with AWS CloudFront CDN

15 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Amazon Route 53 Bootstrap 5.3.3Google Search Console Google Workspace Open Graph React Tailwind CSS
Runtime
styled-components 6.5.3
CDN
AWS CloudFront Amazon CloudFront Amazon S3 jsDelivr jsDelivr CDN
Hosting
AWS Amazon Web Services

All Detected Technologies (15)

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-amz-cf-id: CZ_Ltqq1xD3qlx192JUFTp14mFN21LXNEC0XcCHoRk5bm5RgdSV-fw==

Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ Detected by BeaverCheck

JSDelivr is a free public CDN for open-source projects. It can serve web files directly from the npm registry and GitHub repositories without any configuration.

Categories CDN Website https://www.jsdelivr.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains cdn.jsdelivr.net: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.3/dist/js/bootstrap.bundle.min.js
Categories Hosting Website https://aws.amazon.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Header: X-Amz-Server-Side-Encryption

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.

Categories PaaS Website https://aws.amazon.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Styled components is a CSS-in-JS styling framework that uses tagged template literals in JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Development Website https://styled-components.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-1286.awsdns-32.org

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.3/dist/js/bootstrap.bundle.min.js, Stylesheet: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.3/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=MhvRbxsYPnQbq7y3my99ta9QZkJ4C1EloIBe9XATrmE
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 9 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (3)

Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header

The X-Powered-By header reveals 'styled-components 6.5.3'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

15 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeboplondon.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/beboplondon.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/beboplondon.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeboplondon.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeboplondon.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+8

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (88)
  • · Page weighs 7.7 MB (5.9 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · No H1 heading found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → A (91)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback