Skip to content
https://www.gively.fr Export & share
FR · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: RGPD · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €80/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-08-22 10:57 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
52.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 226ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (75ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (510ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
163ms
DNS 37ms · TLS 23ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
75ms
DNS 25ms · TLS 11ms
United States - Santa Clara
231ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 13ms
United Stated - New York
132ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 9ms
Singapore - Singapore
243ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 12ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
510ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 117ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 226ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

gively.fr fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 3

1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.

Security › Source Map Exposure
Warning: 4

75 third-party resources (79% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 5.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 5.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€600 investment → €9,480/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€600
7.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€9.480
€113.766/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18861% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5200.1 mo payback · +21778% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€40 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
5
3 crit 2 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
64
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 5.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 656ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 4 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€600 7.5 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€40 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.884 / month at risk ~€82.606 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

RGPDEAA
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • 2 of 4 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.883 /mo

+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.50

Bandwidth Waste

€0,45 /mo

6111.2 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~611 KB per page load
    Saves €0,45/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

63
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.65 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.27 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

656 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.74 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

11.47 s

Desktop

95
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

568 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.47 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

16 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

980 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.63 s

Categories

8
Avg score 84.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1159 peers
You 85
·
Avg 74
+11 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P99Security P92Performance P83Compliance P19Content P72Sustainability P70Infrastructure P67SEO P45

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
HSTS · 2852 peers
You 85
·
Avg 76
+9 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P95Security P79Compliance P24Performance P73Content P71Infrastructure P65Sustainability P62SEO P54

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, with Cloudflare CDN

15 technologies detected 4 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Build
Webpack
Framework
Google Font API HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph PWA Radix UI React React Router 7.14.2 Sentry Tailwind CSS shadcn/ui
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (15)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web apps built and enhanced with modern APIs to deliver enhanced capabilities, reliability, and installability while reaching anyone, anywhere, on any device, all with a single codebase.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://web.dev/progressive-web-apps/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Radix UI is a React-based user interface component library that offers accessible, responsive, and customisable components for building web applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://www.radix-ui.com Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://tailwindcss.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 123 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

shadcn/ui is a component system built with Radix UI and Tailwind CSS.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://ui.shadcn.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-ZH3JR51G19
Categories Build Tool Website https://webpack.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Chunk pattern: https://www.gively.fr/static/js/main.cd08f1da.js

Observations (1)

Complex technology stack detected

15 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gively.fr)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/gively.fr)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/gively.fr"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gively.fr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gively.fr

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (87)
  • · 75 third-party resources (79% of weight)
  • · 1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → A (91)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback