Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 19:59 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
49.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 4

is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Image Optimization
Warning: 5

127 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 5.8s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$825 investment → $12,824/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$825
8.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$12,824
$153,890/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18553% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.0 mo payback · +24522% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$25 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.

Barriers
8
3 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+32pp
added vs baseline
Score
55
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 5.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 990ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 62 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$825 8.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$25 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,665 / month at risk ~$103,979 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 3 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,664 /mo

+32.2pp bounce · ~3,221 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.67 /mo

8356.1 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~836 KB per page load
    Saves $0.67/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

31
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.06 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.81 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

990 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.180

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.30 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

20.79 s

Desktop

80
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.20 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.25 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

29 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.093

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.95 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.25 s

Categories

8
Avg score 71.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Angular · 63 peers
You 70
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 9% of Angular sites See full Angular benchmark →
Bulma · 369 peers
You 70
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Content P1SEO P4Compliance P17Performance P22Infrastructure P76Security P28Sustainability P34Accessibility P49

Top 10% of Bulma sites score 97+ on Content; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 6% of Bulma sites See full Bulma benchmark →

Technology stack

Angular 19.2.2, on TypeScript

16 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
AppNexus New Relic OpenX Taboola comScore
Framework
Angular 19.2.2 Bulma Express Google Font API Google Search Console Google Workspace Level Access Zone.js core-js 3.10.2 eSSENTIAL Accessibility
Runtime
TypeScript

All Detected Technologies (16)

TypeScript is an open-source language which builds on JavaScript by adding static type definitions.

Categories Programming languages Website https://www.typescriptlang.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Angular is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://angular.io Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://bulma.io Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 8 Bulma class patterns in HTML
Categories Framework Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence X-Powered-By: Express in redirect

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=Fh5kgKGTJ29NEVP1BckkJXg1haNCTnTlV8_i6vgHn2s
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

Level Access, formerly eSSENTIAL Accessibility, is a leading digital accessibility solutions provider offering tools and services to ensure compliance with standards such as ADA, Section 508, and WCAG​

Categories Accessibility Website https://www.levelaccess.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://github.com/angular/angular/tree/master/packages/zone.js Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

eSSENTIAL Accessibility is a digital accessibility-as-a-service platform.

Categories Accessibility Website https://www.essentialaccessibility.com Detected by BeaverCheck

AppNexus is a cloud-based software platform that enables and optimizes programmatic online advertising.

Categories Advertising Website https://appnexus.com Detected by BeaverCheck

New Relic is a SaaS offering that focuses on performance and availability monitoring.

Categories RUM Website https://newrelic.com Detected by BeaverCheck

OpenX is a programmatic advertising technology company.

Categories Advertising Website https://openx.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Taboola is a content discovery & native advertising platform for publishers and advertisers.

Categories Advertising Website https://www.taboola.com Detected by BeaverCheck

comScore is an American media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises; media and advertising agencies; and publishers.

Categories Analytics Website https://comscore.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Angular) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwunderground.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/5c7dd27e-b9da-4d3a-8802-763269f869fb)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/5c7dd27e-b9da-4d3a-8802-763269f869fb"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwunderground.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwunderground.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected C (78)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (74)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 127 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → C (78)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Send Feedback