Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-11 05:47 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 828ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (267ms), slowest from Santa Clara (1402ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 4 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
1402ms
DNS 333ms · TLS 171ms
Spain - Madrid
319ms
DNS 63ms · TLS 33ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
267ms
DNS 41ms · TLS 17ms
United Stated - New York
532ms
DNS 190ms · TLS 90ms
Singapore - Singapore
1214ms
DNS 588ms · TLS 160ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1236ms
DNS 407ms · TLS 212ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 828ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

3 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Warning: 4

Cookie 'XSRF-TOKEN' is missing the HttpOnly flag

Without HttpOnly, JavaScript can read the cookie — an XSS bug becomes a session-stealing attack.

Security › Cookie Security
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€660 investment → €3,627/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€660
8.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€3,627
€43,518/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6494% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120,500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5600.2 mo payback · +7671% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€20 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~16%.

Barriers
5
1 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+16pp
added vs baseline
Score
78
B
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
1
  • 3 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€660 8.3 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€20 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€10,045,293 / month at risk ~€120,543,518 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120,500,000

ePrivacy DirectiveRGPDEAA
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    RGPD: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    RGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    ePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    RGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • 2 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 200 image(s) with generic alt text
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 3 control(s) without accessible label
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3,626 /mo

+16.5pp bounce · ~1,648 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0.02 /mo

280.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~28 KB per page load
    Saves €0.02/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.27 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.27 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

172 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.13 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.60 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

450 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

450 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

783 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

450 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 81.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Alpine.js · 141 peers
You 85
·
Avg 80
At average
0 50 100
Better than 62% of Alpine.js sites See full Alpine.js benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3759 peers
You 85
·
Avg 73
+12 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P98Performance P96Accessibility P95Sustainability P80Infrastructure P27Content P34SEO P59

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Alpine.js 3.14.9, on PHP, with Nginx CDN

8 technologies detected 3 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Alpine.js 3.14.9Google Search Console HSTS Laravel Livewire Tailwind CSS
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (8)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Alpine.js is a minimal framework for composing behavior directly in your markup.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://alpinejs.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=aYDAWZe7hIKZc2Mabbt1Gi0OpLpTwPbns9pcbLmY20A

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Laravel is a free, open-source PHP web framework.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://laravel.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Livewire is a full-stack Laravel framework for building dynamic interfaces.

Categories Web frameworks, Miscellaneous Website https://laravel-livewire.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 71 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Alpine.js) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxivclimbers.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/5d02b8c5-f673-478e-aa90-dd9cfb1f2cfb)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/5d02b8c5-f673-478e-aa90-dd9cfb1f2cfb"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxivclimbers.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxivclimbers.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+1

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (86)
  • · Cookie 'XSRF-TOKEN' is missing the HttpOnly flag

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

4 findings 8h → B (89)
  • · 3 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback