Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
100
TTFB stable →
448ms
FCP degrading ↓
1.1s
LCP stable →
1.2s
Scanned
2026-05-21 04:09 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
38.00s
Vs prev
Improved by +5

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 571ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (135ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1063ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

United Stated - New York
Full audit
448ms
DNS 176ms · TLS 89ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
135ms
DNS 49ms · TLS 29ms
Spain - Madrid
142ms
DNS 43ms · TLS 31ms
United States - Santa Clara
762ms
DNS 306ms · TLS 150ms
Singapore - Singapore
875ms
DNS 356ms · TLS 172ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1063ms
DNS 414ms · TLS 215ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 571ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 4

2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 5

3 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.

Security › Cross-Origin Tab Safety
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. The 1 performance issue below shapes how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€793 investment → €3,377/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€793
9.9 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€3.377
€40.523/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+5008% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€6130.2 mo payback · +6507% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€33 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~15%.

Barriers
6
6 warn
Bounce delta
+15pp
added vs baseline
Score
82
B
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€793 9.9 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€33 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€3.377 / month at risk ~€40.523 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveRGPDEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    RGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3.377 /mo

+15.3pp bounce · ~1,535 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,38 /mo

5069.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~507 KB per page load
    Saves €0,38/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 80.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Font Awesome · 556 peers
You 84
·
Avg 73
+11 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P99Performance P95Accessibility P95SEO P15Sustainability P76Content P27Infrastructure P53

Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 58 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 97% of Font Awesome sites See full Font Awesome benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3802 peers
You 84
·
Avg 73
+11 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P98Performance P95Accessibility P95Sustainability P73SEO P33Content P34Infrastructure P54

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 58 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 97% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Font Awesome 5.15.3, with Cloudflare CDN

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Font Awesome 5.15.3Google Search Console HSTS jQuery 3.6.1
CDN
Cloudflare cdnjs

All Detected Technologies (6)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

cdnjs is a free distributed JS library delivery service.

Categories CDN Website https://cdnjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains cdnjs.cloudflare.com: https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/font-awesome/5.15.3/js/all.min.js

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=HPZwhfgUFzTBUml-6oj_bE-NJCJcrphdGt2j8CAZ770

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.1/jquery.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Font Awesome) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/5d116181-4c96-417e-8c2e-5c92ed53ae41)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/5d116181-4c96-417e-8c2e-5c92ed53ae41"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 10h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (87)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 3 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → B (89)
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · 2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+2

Higher effort, long-term payoff

1 findings 6h → A (91)
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback