Skip to content
https://www.shreeinfotechsystems.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance degrading ↓
53
TTFB degrading ↓
1.1s
FCP improving ↑
3.4s
LCP improving ↑
5.9s
Scanned
2026-09-18 14:26 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev
Declined by -1

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 907ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (244ms), slowest from Singapore (2060ms). Assets on Cloudflare (host cdn.shopify.com, 34 assets); document served directly from origin (DigitalOcean). 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
572ms
DNS 234ms · TLS 112ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
633ms
DNS 327ms · TLS 104ms
United Stated - New York
286ms
DNS 196ms · TLS 35ms
Singapore - Singapore
2060ms
DNS 496ms · TLS 240ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1647ms
DNS 1265ms · TLS 128ms
United States - Santa Clara
244ms
DNS 32ms · TLS 71ms
CDN: Cloudflare (assets only) · Avg TTFB: 907ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

shreeinfotechsystems.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

Page weighs 11.6 MB (4.0 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

10 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

4 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 8.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 8.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$475 investment → $9,530/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$475
4.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$9,530
$114,361/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+23976% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$3750.0 mo payback · +30396% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
5
2 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
71
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
1
  • Page takes 8.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 6.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 4 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 2 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$475 4.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$3,136 / month at risk ~$37,636 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • Multiple <main> landmarks (2 found)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H3 (missing H2)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H4 (missing H3)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$3,135 /mo

+27.0pp bounce · ~2,703 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 1.16

Bandwidth Waste

$1.00 /mo

12469.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.2 MB per page load
    Saves $1.00/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

57
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.65 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.49 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

127 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.006

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

8.41 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.64 s

Desktop

75
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.71 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.38 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.97 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.41 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 691 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P4Accessibility P84SEO P84Security P79Performance P75Content P68Sustainability P44Compliance P55

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 93+ on Infrastructure; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 82% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
Google Font API · 1254 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P3Accessibility P89Security P85SEO P83Content P72Performance P66Sustainability P39Compliance P50

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 84% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API

10 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Google Font API Google Maps Lucide Open Graph React React Router 7.18.3 Tailwind CSS

All Detected Technologies (10)

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Maps is a web mapping service. It offers satellite imagery, aerial photography, street maps, 360° interactive panoramic views of streets, real-time traffic conditions, and route planning for traveling by foot, car, bicycle and air, or public transportation.

Categories Maps Website https://maps.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 239 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-EVT5G5JTWM

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.shreeinfotechsystems.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/shreeinfotechsystems.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/shreeinfotechsystems.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.shreeinfotechsystems.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.shreeinfotechsystems.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (88)
  • · Page weighs 11.6 MB (4.0 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 10 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → A (92)
  • · 4 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback