Audit overview
All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
4High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
1High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
bookmakerbonus.it fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
14 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
45 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€243 investment → €6,138/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.
- Page takes 4.1s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 1.6s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 607msClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- Severe layout shift during page loadUsers mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration→ Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
- 27 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€500.000
- No <main> landmark foundEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- No <nav> landmark foundEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€3.641 /mo
+33.9pp bounce · ~3,390 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 1.07
Bandwidth Waste
€0,32 /mo
4317.2 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~432 KB per page loadSaves €0,32/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.72 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
4.12 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
607 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.261
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.72 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
7.51 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
613 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.04 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
15 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.011
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
613 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.15 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
14 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 93+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Craft CMS, on PHP, with Imgix CDN
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
SEOmatic 
Cart Functionality 
Craft CMS 
Alpine.js Hotjar 
Htmx 2.0.10
Open Graph 
Tailwind CSS 
Yii 
PHP 
Imgix 
Nginx All Detected Technologies (14)
Imgix is a visual media platform for managing, processing, rendering, optimising and delivering your existing images.
Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
Craft CMS is a content management system for building bespoke websites.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
Alpine.js is a minimal framework for composing behavior directly in your markup.
Htmx is a JavaScript library for performing AJAX requests, triggering CSS transitions, and invoking WebSocket and server-sent events directly from HTML elements.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Yii is an open-source, object-oriented, component-based MVC PHP web application framework.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
SEOmatic facilitates modern SEO best practices & implementation for Craft CMS 3.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Alpine.js) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/bookmakerbonus.it)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/bookmakerbonus.it"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FBookmakerbonus.it" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FBookmakerbonus.itExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (89)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · No <main> landmark found
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 14 button(s) with no accessible text
- · 45 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing