Skip to content
RU · RUB (₽) · Estimated Dev cost: ₽3,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-16 17:20 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
1.4m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Cookie 'cookieChoice' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 5

15 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽48,125 investment → ₽211,862/month returns

Investment
₽48 125
13.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₽211 862
₽2 542 350/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+5183% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽42 8750.2 mo payback · +5830% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₽2 625 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
7
3 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
58
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 13.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 11.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.2s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽48,125 13.8 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽2,625 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽185 955 / month at risk ~₽2 231 458 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽185 895 /mo

+31.0pp bounce · ~3,098 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽59 /mo

8176.1 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~818 KB per page load
    Saves ₽59/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

33
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.54 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.85 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.19 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.74 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

17.18 s

Desktop

61
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.58 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.82 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

491 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.007

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.40 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.47 s

Categories

8
Avg score 74.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 73
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
SEO P2Sustainability P13Security P84Content P82Performance P23Compliance P26Infrastructure P43Accessibility P49

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 79 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 39% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
core-js · 1582 peers
You 73
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
SEO P4Sustainability P17Security P83Content P81Compliance P27Performance P39Infrastructure P41Accessibility P49

Top 10% of core-js sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 79 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 49% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 1-0-9

20 technologies detected 2 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
ADFOX Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Yandex.Metrika
Framework
Bootstrap 1-0-9Facebook Floating UI Google Search Console HSTS MobX Native app preferred Open Graph Priority Hints React 18.2.0 React Router 7.11.0 RequireJS 2.1.11 VKUI core-js 3.37.1 jQuery 1.8.3 web-vitals

All Detected Technologies (20)

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=20zoxd8vljdt1j42fswju4pushgv41

A JavaScript library to position floating elements and create interactions for them.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://floating-ui.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=Ulruf8YYkR5p9-2klauDQNcJNSXgLzqmpqZuu3btFzE

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://mobx.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Other Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence Manifest prefer_related_applications is true

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: //st-ok.cdn-vk.ru/res/react/vendor/react-dom-18.2.0-amd.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck

RequireJS is a JavaScript library and file loader which manages the dependencies between JavaScript files and in modular programming.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://requirejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

VKUI is a set of React components with which you can create interfaces that are visually indistinguishable from our iOS and Android applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://vkcom.github.io/VKUI Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: //st-ok.cdn-vk.ru/res/js/jquery-1.8.3_65hpifcf.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

The web-vitals JavaScript is a tiny, modular library for measuring all the web vitals metrics on real users.

Categories JavaScript libraries, RUM Website https://github.com/GoogleChrome/web-vitals Detected by BeaverCheck

ADFOX is an advertising management platform for media publishers.

Categories Advertising Website https://adfox.yandex.ru Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google-analytics.com: https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-GEGXS3ELM6&cx=c&gtm=4e64f0

Yandex.Metrica is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://metrika.yandex.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (4)

jQuery loaded alongside a modern framework

Both jQuery and React are loaded. Modern frameworks handle DOM manipulation natively. jQuery may be unnecessary and adds ~30KB to the page weight. Check the Performance tab for bundle analysis.

→ Performance

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 1.8.3. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

20 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fok.ru)](https://beavercheck.com/results/61593201-48a7-4896-93d0-5c6ab1d675bd)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/61593201-48a7-4896-93d0-5c6ab1d675bd"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fok.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fok.ru

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 14h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · Cookie 'cookieChoice' is missing the Secure flag
  • · 15 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → C (78)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+4

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → B (82)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback