Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
69
TTFB stable →
106ms
FCP stable →
4.1s
LCP stable →
5.4s
Scanned
2026-05-25 01:17 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
42.00s
Vs prev
Improved by +6

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 326ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (16ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (569ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
106ms
DNS 22ms · TLS 28ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
16ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 7ms
United Stated - New York
341ms
DNS 84ms · TLS 87ms
United States - Santa Clara
436ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 145ms
Singapore - Singapore
486ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 162ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
569ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 190ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 326ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Content needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

44 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£619 investment → £8,098/month returns + GBP 50,000 risk avoided

Investment
£619
8.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
£8,098
£97,173/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15605% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 50,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£4690.1 mo payback · +20630% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£56 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~23%.

Barriers
6
1 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+23pp
added vs baseline
Score
75
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 5.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£619 8.3 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£56 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£4,927 / month at risk ~£59,120 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£50,000

Equality Act 2010
  • No <main> landmark found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • No headings found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£4,926 /mo

+23.5pp bounce · ~2,346 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£0.23 /mo

3656.3 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~366 KB per page load
    Saves £0.23/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

69
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
68
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.05 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.39 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

129 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.010

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.05 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.28 s

Desktop

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.16 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.39 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.16 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.39 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3801 peers
You 81
·
Avg 73
+8 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P95Security P94Content P10Performance P75Compliance P27SEO P67Infrastructure P36Sustainability P55

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
Google Workspace · 1757 peers
You 81
·
Avg 74
+7 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P97Security P95Content P12Compliance P23Performance P73Infrastructure P29SEO P69Sustainability P48

Top 10% of Google Workspace sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of Google Workspace sites See full Google Workspace benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, with Nginx CDN

5 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console Google Workspace RequireJS 2.3.6 jQuery 1.12.4
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (5)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=AaqKS4MdHV6EpISaFwBtduOlvf79g3Wx5QxzTIl1ECQ
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

RequireJS is a JavaScript library and file loader which manages the dependencies between JavaScript files and in modular programming.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://requirejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://assets-cdn77.xvideos-cdn.com/v3/js/libs/jquery.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 1.12.4. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxvideos.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/62280ddc-706d-4e37-ba37-bfb60ee16e1f)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/62280ddc-706d-4e37-ba37-bfb60ee16e1f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxvideos.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxvideos.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (89)
  • · 44 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback