Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-24 00:06 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
30.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Strong global performance — average 112ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (41ms), slowest from Singapore (217ms). Cloudflare edge cache (HIT).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
144ms
DNS 50ms · TLS 27ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
41ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 8ms
United Stated - New York
120ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 10ms
United States - Santa Clara
81ms
DNS 23ms · TLS 11ms
Singapore - Singapore
217ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 8ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
68ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: Cloudflare (HIT) · Avg TTFB: 112ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

0

High impact, low effort — start here.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

1

Small gains, minimal effort.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

choicervoicergame.online fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 2

Compressed response missing `Vary` header

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Server Response Intelligence
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

No DMARC record found

Without DMARC, anyone can send phishing emails using your domain name.

Security › Email Security
Warning: 5

Permissions-Policy covers 3/10 high-risk features (30%)

Informational: a labeled value pair from the audit.

Security › Permissions-Policy Granularity
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. The 1 performance issue below shapes how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

Return on Investment

Your site is healthy — fixing remaining items has minimal financial upside.

We surface the figures only when the projected returns clear a 1% noise floor of the investment, so we don't print a misleading ROI when the audit is essentially clean. The sections below still list the specific findings if you want to chase the last few points.

Conversion barriers

No conversion barriers detected.

Barriers
0
Bounce delta
+0pp
added vs baseline
Score
100
A+
Speed
0
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
0

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€850 10.0 developer hours at €85/hr

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€0,03 / month at risk ~€0,38 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bandwidth Waste

€0,03 /mo

425.0 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~43 KB per page load
    Saves €0,03/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.00 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.09 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.00 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.09 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

399 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

486 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

399 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

486 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 91.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 4393 peers
You 91
·
Avg 75
+16 above average
0 50 100
SEO P99Performance P97Security P94Accessibility P94Sustainability P94Compliance P16Content P84Infrastructure P73

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 71 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 3295 peers
You 91
·
Avg 78
+13 above average
0 50 100
SEO P99Performance P96Sustainability P92Security P89Accessibility P89Content P81Compliance P24Infrastructure P71

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 71 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 92% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, with Cloudflare CDN

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph Priority Hints
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (6)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=eg5TcKdKCP5sefOac1PH9CgrQv-86wjoqQKbLuP6bP0

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchoicervoicergame.online)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/choicervoicergame.online)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/choicervoicergame.online"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchoicervoicergame.online" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchoicervoicergame.online

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 10h total → projected A (94)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+1

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → A (92)
  • · Permissions-Policy covers 3/10 high-risk features (30%)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 4h → A (94)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · No DMARC record found
  • · Compressed response missing `Vary` header

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

Higher effort, long-term payoff

1 findings 6h → A (94)
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback